They generally call out cringy douchey misleading bullshit videos while addimg humor. If you spent the time watching a few videos they are actually very good and very strict on morals and ethics

The article is false by claiming that H3H3 mocked Matt Hoss. They in no way broke fair use law by using bits from his video since they were used to criticize Matt Hoss and his video. Mockery is defined as “making fun of someone or something in a cruel way” while criticism is defined as “the analysis and judgment of…

Lmbooooo Matt Hoss in the house. Or is this Bradberry? Salads?

Whether you like them is not the point. The point is anyone should be able to make that video that they made without being sued.

The judge spends about five pages talking about fair use. It starts on pg.5 of the ruling under the heading, Fair Use.

No, That’s not what H3H3 did AT ALL. Your analogy is absurd and you clearly don’t know anything about the case.

Matt Hoss?

I assume this is Matt Hoss’ burner. You’re insane dude.

Now is a good time to point out that the couple behind the H3H3 channel aren’t necessarily angels.