I know you're feeling defensive here, but the way you wrote this comment seriously makes it sound like a racially charged comment. You can't control how we read your comment, only how you phrased it, so I beg you clarify exactly what it is in this video that makes you think this woman is "not an innocent flower" who…

Right?? It doesn't say anything about him, but her?? What is this!

I agree. They would have starved this baby to death - attempted murder.

Oh yes! So I can agree that the OP's post was a bit inappropriate for this context and it seems we agree that the woman's face argument doesn't make sense. Glad we sorted that out!

Thanks for clarifying! Makes a lot more sense.

Can you clarify your first two sentences? I'm not sure what subject matter or poster you're referring to, and I'm getting all the "it"s mixed up!

No. I'm saying that your hypothetical is irrevelent. It's irrelevant for two reasons:
1. It's a hypothetical, so you're comparing something that did happen with something that didn't, which is idiotic and a complete waste of thought.

2. It requires you to believe that institutional sexism doesn't exist now nor has it…

BAHAHAHA perfect gif here too!

Goodness gracious they out in full force today! Don't you know that history and culture don't exist and we can actually compare your response to a man writing the same thing on a picture of a woman? #reversesexism

I think one result is that it totally renders gay women's identities as invalid or non-existent. While these messages towards straight women are certainly disgusting and disrespectful (and DEFINITELY use the same line of logic that there's no possible way a woman could have a sexual preference that's of equal…

LOL you clearly just need a dick. It would make you feel better. Hit me up and I'll send you a pic, honey. #shameless

Absolutely not. I don't think you get it; see men are complex, individual human beings and women are just props in porn who exist for men to look at and put their penises in. They don't actually have sexual desires or things they DON'T like, they just hop on the penis when they see it because they all want it. Hope…

pure ignorance about lesbianism and women in general

I'll blame my non-detail-oriented self :) thanks!

ETA: replied to wrong post

I'm here any time you have a literary device question!

That definition means irony is when you find humor/meaning in the gap between what's expected and what actually happens, like sarcasm. Using language that usually means one thing, but through context and tone implying the opposite. So Lindy is being ironic by using over-the-top, language "as if she were a…

Do you think it means something other than "the expression of meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, often for humorous or emphatic effect"?

WooOOooOOOoOooooooOOoooo....FASCINATING EXCITEMENT NEWS!!!

It's ironic.