Bullshit, post a single tweet that shows this

I do follow her and no she doesn't 

Did you even read the post I was replying to? because it contains the phrase “She’s avoiding actively calling for harm.”

Can you give me a specific example of this, I'm honestly trying to learn specifically what she said and I've read through alot of it but I have yet to come across something where she specifically points towards something expressing or wanting hate or harm to come to trans people

i don’t believe this to be true. she obviously has a hateful and outmoded worldview but i don’t think she’s celebrating murders.

None of these are calls to violence like you suggest. They are simply “dick moves”. Is JK an asshole? Yes. Is she LITERALLY causing the deaths of trans people? No.

Yeah it would be shocking if it were true, but it’s not. She has never advocated for violence.

Not that I don’t trust random Kotaku forum posters, but...

This is ridiculous.

Yea this. The trans people I know have experienced much worse than being excluded from the definition of feminism. If you really think that’s the worst kind of anti-trans bigotry out there, I recommend that you get to know a trans person and ask them how concerned they are about Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminism vs…

Buy the game or don’t buy the game. Buying it will make JKR richer, but you know what they say - never meet your heroes.

I may be misreading it, but it sure sounds like the implication is that HP itself is disposable, it happens to have a lot of supporters, and because of that WB has no problem “aligning with a transphobe”, as if that was the decision being made. Which is just, again, ridiculous.

The reality is to people on Kotaku and…

JK Rowling has more money than God so I don’t buy the whole “If you buy this game you’re supporting a horrible person” schtick, she doesn’t need supporting, the entire franchise could collapse into obscurity tomorrow and she’d still die with more money in the cracks of her sofa than most people earn in a lifetime. We…

Your choice to purchase, or not to purchase, this game has absolutely no impact on Rowling. None. If you looked up “fuck you money” in the dictionary you’d probably find her face smiling back at you.

How does she celebrate every time that happens?

‘anyone who pledges to support her monetarily is also a transphobe’ and comments like that, where people say ‘you’re x if you y’, immediately draw my ire. Give me a reason that’s substantiated, not a threat of your perception of me shifting.

She’s an asshole, for sure, but has she really “proven herself to be the worst kind of anti-transgender bigot”?

It’s not funny, it’s creepy.

She did not eviscerate him. She derailed the conversation to lecture him on trans-inclusive language, and then accused him of causing trans people to commit suicide because he was confused about trans-inclusive language.

Yeah, I’m honestly tired of these headlines in liberal-leaning publications saying some right-wing loon was “eviscerated”. Even as a figure of speech they’re taking all the meaning out of it.

When I think about that term, I’m thinking about someone having a point made at them from which there is no escape, that sits…