Who says it needs to be federal? Letitia James could get herself into the Senate for life if she unseals an indictment right after the inauguration.

He actually did obstruct. BUT HIS EMAILS!!!!!!

Know where I can get a pipe screen the size of a tank hatch? I have the best idea..

LOL ‘I’m not gonna watch it! Okay, I’ll watch a little bit. (I’m totally watching it).’

I have about 15 years experience of investigating myself, I can tell you it’s NSFW.

False.

This is why I’m fine with the Dems biding their time re: impeachment. If Trump is impeached, he’ll cry and whine and moan and use the narrative to paint himself as a victim. If we vote his bloated ass out, he lost. Oh, he’ll cry about how illegals voted and how it was a fraud and blah blah blah—but he’ll know—deep down…

Republican: “So, Mr. Mueller. How would you describe the - garbled speech - hunt into the president?”

One can make a smoking implement out of many, many pieces of military hardware, it’s true.

“Mueller was asked whether or not the investigation was impeded in any way, and he said no.” In other words, there was NO OBSTRUCTION.

Then Trump just started babbling in all caps the same way my sisters did after special counsel Dorothy Harriot finished her investigation and concluded that she was just going to whip everybody’s ass. 

Not even close to being scared. However, when and if anyone gets their hands on his tax returns (before the 2020 election), then he’ll be SCARED AF!

READ THE REPORT!  lol

Someone had yet to learn you don’t hide a lit cigarette in a sock drawer, no matter how much those sound like Mom’s footsteps?

He literally asked why Mueller didn’t investigate himself...?

I don’t.. what would that even look like?

“This has been a disaster for the Democrats and a disaster for the reputation of Robert Mueller.”

I don’t think he is though. Being afraid requires some sort of ability to understand the consequences of your actions. I don’t think he can do that on account of the obvious dementia brought on by a lifetime of racism.

Pleading the Fifth is not an admission of guilt. That’s just an implication that people have falsely attached to it. It can also be used by innocent people to avoid saying anything that can be misconstrued and used against them. When it comes to the law, you don’t have to prove you didn’t do something, only not give…

A question for the lawyers: my understanding of “pleading the fifth” is that witnesses may do so when the response to a question might incriminate them. Is this accurate?