It’s also brave of Blizzard to include Zenyatta, a Nepalese robosexual, in their cast.

Wowie. What is that, 7 sentences? Is this what people accept as content? Copying and pasting AP reports? How many degrees do I need to be a writer at Jezebel?

I don’t understand the joke here. I guess the author thinks that young adults don’t ever have children and don’t racially mix? And I guess the author is expressing her distaste for young people being photogenic through the eyes of a toddler?

Are people finally realizing that sexualization doesn’t matter? Or is there still a serious level of cognitive dissonance...

But that’s just it, nobody should give a shit either way. The post you’re responding to certainly doesn’t care. Only you seem to.

There’s no logic to be had at all if you’re using an argument like that.

People are elected on their beliefs... that’s why we don’t pick representatives out of a hat.

It doesn’t take college degree to understand that anti-choice and pro-life are not the same thing. It doesn’t take a career in politics to understand that the death penalty and war are completely incomparible to the stance pro-life people take.

If they’re adapting because they want more women in the military, and not something that was going to occur anyway, this really just proves exactly what so many feared. Compromises are being made...

Women need to stop womensplaining why their purse needs to go on the seat beside them instead of their lap.

There is something about this movie that turns everyone into a furry.

Up-and-coming Jigglypuff champion.

TLDR: People shouldn’t work harder than me because I hate competition.

Another Doctor Who spinoff, huh? First Torchwood, then Broadchurch... They just don’t quit.

His behavior being... committing the atrocity of mistakenly picking up something? It’s sad that society has come to this... making benign mistakes. God help us. If people are going to argue for wage transparency, you can’t get pissed every time someone’s wage is accidentally mentioned.

Perhaps she doesn’t like the stance Feminism takes on sexism, that is, an explicitly feminine focused one.

That’s not true.

A quick google on specifics gave me this: http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/…

Are you saying the government is allowed to discriminate based on sexual orientation? I’m not sure that’s legal...

“The only thing I can think of is if churches were forced to perform ceremonies for homosexuals, going against their beliefs. But that’ll never happen.”

Guilty until proven innocent.