Well now you know what became of the likely lads. They were on a road to ruin, the victims of a campaign of hate, but now they get along and they're reliving the good old days.

ar u avin a fukin giggle, m8

Now 19 Kids and Counting just sounds like a running total Josh Duggar kept in his teenage years. Unfortunately.

The Daily Mail/The Daily Express
"I wish this story had something to do with Islam"

That was indeed the point of the change (well, that and I've just binge-watched series 1 of Brooklyn Nine-Nine over a few days, so it's taken over my brain). As to the second point - meh, I sporadically hate my country, so I can live with it.

The A.V. Club
"but then I remembered I don't have standards"

Well, you know what they say, a touring Stones gathers no moss.

We had Blackadder Goes Forth, some of U2's greatest stuff, New Order and Depeche Mode. Culturally, that's stuff worth being nostalgic about.

[Simpsonesque awkward collar-tug]

With most of the before-I-was-even-born pop-culture, I'm either at least dimly aware of it or am at least dimly aware of something associated with it, but this might as well have been any three paragraphs of Finnegans Wake.

As an 18-year-old Brit, approximately 1.5 sentences in this article made sense to me.

Why are they marketing it to the teens of 1991?

I don't think Donald Trump knows how to daintily do anything.

In what probably has something to do with being a cis male who is therefore not having his existence and identity called into question, I don't find those questions offensive, merely ignorant and/or contemptible. I'm down with free speech being a broadly good thing, but the freedom of people to air their opinions…

Richard Dawkins, much as he has made valuable contributions to science, is an utter tosser and sometimes makes me almost ashamed to be an atheist.

I like how the "It can be two things" meme on the A.V. Club is gradually being distilled and condensed, evolving as time goes by. It's been quite beautiful to observe and participate in.

As a feminist, I have approximately as much respect for TER"F"s and the concept of TER"F" in general as I do for the Tea Party and fundamentalist hate-preachers. There is no difference whatsoever between being a TER"F" and being a racist "feminist".

I'm intrigued as to how a free-market right-libertarian economic journal that does not invariably tow the standard Western line on everything is supposedly fuel for left-wing liberal hipsters.

Undoubtedly. We're talking about a movement whose critical thinking skills extend to "I CAN'T MANSPREAD SO I'M MORE OPPRESSED THAN WOMEN WILL EVER BE" and "Women in many non-Western countries have fucking terrible lives, therefore somehow feminism is irrelevant" here.

"Now don't get me wrong, I'm all for personal liberty and equality and all that good stuff, but if a whopping 10-20% of the population wants to get married on their own terms rather than according to an outdated sort-of-but-not-really-Biblical conception of marriage, not to mention in some cases even go as far as…