Yeah, but if this school is receiving one penny in federal funding, I wouldn’t mind bringing the hammer down on shit like this.
Bill Hendry
freenickyoung
Now playing
Earlier this morning, this very website presented the case against pets. I would like to offer the following…
I would much rather they leave us out completely than this shit that misrepresents.
Native here as well, I don't agree. These are appropriated and not great.
oh I take no issue with your differing opinion. But trying to appoint yourself as some kind of voice for Indian Country? That I find ridiculous.
No one’s saying it’s maliciously racist. Just lazy as fuck. Which happens all too often. And deserves every ounce of criticism it gets.
Hey that’s cool. As a white male, I’ll get on the horn and let every single white male in America that they don’t have to feel bad now.
Oy Vey.
Poor Patty Mills. So young, so full of life. You will be missed brother.
That’s what you took from it. Amazing. Sometimes I forget I’m on Gawker, but then I get to the comments, and I’m like “Oh yeah!”
That’s what you took from it. Amazing. Sometimes I forget I’m on Gawker, but then I get to the comments, and I’m…
These people truly believe that they compelled by God to establish an American Christian theocracy. It’s batshit and terrifying.
Do you like movies about gladiators?
i dunno but it’s gotta be something racist
“No one at ESPN wants Rovell beheaded in Times Square, but many were angry he still gets paid to rephrase #brand #content.”
A lot of what’s referred to as “PC” nowadays is just people not being retrograde sociopaths.
Dunno, it seems like a pretty good position to me. Refusing to take orders from a remora piece of shit like Dana White is the right move, every time.
I think you’ve got it backward, my friend. It’s more like: a lot of terrible players ended up on the mid-late ’90s Rangers.
It has nothing to do with the interference call. Look at that girl’s reaction. I know a sidepiece when I see one.
We are currently in the 21st century. We are in the second decade of the 21st century and there are not one, not…
Wow, go with the whole “It was sarcasm!” defense. Great. Except even knowing it’s sarcasm, I can’t make heads or tails of your comment. I guess it’s nonsense, then.
The article isn’t stating that about The Jungle Book either. Read the article and not just the title: it’s stating that we need to place Kipling and the book in their proper context.