Hmm. I've always heard that people get JAIL for 1 year or less. If the sentence is for 366 days, does that mean that she has to be in a PRISON facility?

I'm sure her daughter is disappointed that she didn't get more.

Their main product is a tobacco-derived anti-inflammatory called Antabloc. During the trial, witnesses testified that McDonnell even tried to shill the product to Ann Romney, telling her it could cure her multiple sclerosis.

Antabloc kind of reminds me of Tomacco.

What if I told you

I think there are plenty of women who do this, too.

She is lumping herself in with Anna Wintour.

I...don't think this is about the fact that he's black tbh

This oughta be good.

May I suggest a name? Organ Grindr.

I donated my kidney to my husband. It was a good one too. And now, he will get up from bed to get me a snack anytime, and he makes me coffee every morning. I suspect it's all related:)

Ugh, talk about starting a relationship in the hole. A debt you actually can't repay sounds like a pretty awful basis for marriage.

There are several weird conflations in this post. A) Sponsoring legislation =passing bills. This is clearly not true. I doubt the 20 women of the Senate are passing many bills (ie voting by a majority to move them out of the Senate) by themselves regardless of how many they may sponsor. B) Passing bills=good This is…

Ah, the magical nineties, when every baby boomer starring movie had to have a "let's dance to an oldie" moment.

Who are these simple bitches that would not pay Goldie whatever she needed to make this sequel happen?

I love this, but I feel like part of why this dynamic exist is because there are so few women in Congress.

The scientific validity of this study has unfortunately been compromised by a small sample size.

If there was only a way to not just measure the quantity of bills passed by female senators but also the quality - meaning the effect of said bills on the general public. Without information about the latter, the former doesn't tell much.

I dunno, it does seem like a combination of prudishness and simplification rules out more people than necessary. We already rely on people not lying about having had sex with men in the first place, so I don't see why more detail would hurt.

Yeah, my Dad works in blood banking, so I'm familiar with their reasons for that policy. Some stuff doesn't seem to make sense though. According to their 2010 estimate, Black heterosexual women constitute almost double the number new infections relative to Black heterosexual men, and more than double relative to White…