Tastes change, sure. My point is that social media doesn’t just allow for change, you need to deny. It’s not enough that you don’t like it now, you need to not like it then.

The cartoon was giant when it came out. I'm not trying to dig on you, but it's surprising you never heard any kids talking about it. Even my kids today know about it. 

Just reading through the replies to this article proves the point. None of these people saw the movie, but they already agree with the review. He just writes for the praise and noting else. 

I mean, Germain thought the first trailer of Ghostbusters 2016 was “perfect” before changing his review the next day to “flawed” solely based on how people in the comments criticized him. He reviews solely on what the people want to hear, nothing more. He could review this movie without seeing it based on what people…

Social media killed fandoms. You’re no longer allowed to have a different opinion from those that yell loudest. No one wants to stand up for what they like when some asshole just shows up to shout you down.

Billboard charts use an outdated system that gives low-density areas more pull than individuals? 

That’s how trolls get their trigger fill. 

We also got along fine before phones, cars, electricity, the wheel. Now they’re indispensable parts of people’s lives? Horseshit. People are just fucking lazy.

No, it comes down to you being so stupid you don’t understand the difference between respecting a right to have an opinion and respecting an opinion.

What about the opinion of the Klansman that believes the black girl down the street should be violently raped and lynched?

You made the claim. You back it up.

“All of them.” Says the person who cannot point to one instance of removing a regulation and improving safety. Good job.

So, what product is rendered more safe by less regulation?

What regulations in specific don't work? I'm still waiting. 

Or say school is the Devil's Playground. Because that's my sincerely-held religious belief. I'll take my GED at age 7 now. 

That’s a great example of regulations not being enforced. I’m glad you agree that the bridge building should’ve had more regulatory oversight.

And you don’t understand that I’m asking for an example of a product that is safer without regulation than with it. If you think Boeing doesn’t test their products, then you should really look into how they build their planes. What happened to the 737 MAX is an example of what happens when regulations aren’t enforced,…

What regulations, specifically, make things more unsafe? I’m interested to know. What regulation made the 737 MAX more unsafe? Or just any product in general?

That is one advantage. Though I’ll trade faster heating for faster changes in cooking temperature any day.

So, without regulation, Boeing would just be better for no reason at all?