I know what you wrote, and I understood it. My point is that this is always what happens whenever someone listens to people on the internet. They will always use it as an example later on. This isn't the first time, and it won't be the last. 

Okay. But how would less regulation have prevented the crashes?

But you said regulators weren’t doing their job. What specifically about the regulations was bad?

Hi, I know it's your first day on the internet, but in reference to your cloud-yelling, I'd refer you to the entire fucking internet. 

Even "cavemen" knew that fire was good. 

Wait, you worry about running out of gas from a utility-supplied gas line? What are you cooking?

You think regulation was the problem behind 2 plane crashes?

Same thing sort of happened with my wife. Her whole life she had electric. Our first place together had electric. Our second place had gas and I was over the moon. She didn't understand until she cooked dinner one night and fell in love. It's night and day. 

That was supposed to be “the VW bus.”

I have a really nice electric stove top. It heats up fast, does a pretty good job of staying hot, and the on/off cycle isn’t bad.

The thing is, explosions don’t accelerate beyond the initial blast. Once the detonation happens, everything immediately begins to decelerate.

But the thinking about it is so much fun! 

Sorry I tried to help. Enjoy your night. 

It’s my belief that this paper will be disproved pretty fast. It's inconsistent with current models in a way that doesn't challenge them, instead it just doesn't work. Papers like that in the science community are interesting, but they point more toward an error in measurement or equipment. It's like if you built a…

You can "what-if" anything to death. But that's just not how the universe works. If there's no deviation over trillions of miles, there's no deviation. 

It has to do with weight and efficiency. Not with leaving junk behind. People don’t leave trash at a campsite because it costs them billions of dollars and years of research to pick it up. They do it because they’re assholes.

But it's dumb to go to the moon and carry the entire landing craft back into space. That will drive up costs like crazy and just be super inefficient. 

This one costs more and charges the government more.

Rick and Morty got you covered. 

I’d say that our ability to get to the moon certainly is evidence in favor of a flat universe. But the best use of geometry as evidence would be how we measure the distance of stars. It’s all calculated through amazingly giant triangles and incredibly precise measurements of angles and distance.