Titanic succeeded because you wanted to watch the boat sink, not becauseyou were surprised. It was a telling of a real-life event. Had that been a fictional story, no one would accept that the boat would’ve been so poorly constructed with so few life boats.

No, it’s pointless to tell a story when there’s no suspense, and most of the heroes succeeding has to do with the bad guys being so incompetent as to make you wonder how they gained power to begin with.

And it was a pretty bland movie.

It’s odd how most people beyond people you know think it was a good movie. Along with most critics. Which would mean that Solo not performing well has more to do with people just not giving a shit about a Solo movie in general as opposed to their opinion on another movie not related to Solo.

Don’t forget the masturbation.

Yeah. Rogue One was great because you never knew if they’d succeed in stealing the plans. I love that sense of the unknown.

Let me guess: most of these folks are online?

No, it’s not. Not if there’s no break.

Because only the body dies and the conciousness is transferred.

That makes no sense.

Not if your conscious continues. Your conscious will notice nothing has changed except your body.

But if you don’t notice the change, no.

So, which is? Believe everything I see, or don’t take it as 100% honest?

Yes. And you took that as 100% honest. Weird.

How?

If you wake up with the same consciousness, just in a different body, you continue to live.

But do you know it was out of the park?

(We like to pretend robots are humans around here. Because reasons. Shhhh.)

Yeah. Because he either murdered his human daughter, or just shot a robot.

Was that out of the park?