The best 991 is made by Ruf.

Ah, now I get it. You're referring to the distance between driver and object that's being hit.

Thin cockpit? The thinness is of no matter. A F1 tub is one of the safest places to be, unless there's a freak accident like in Bianchi's case. Take a look at Kubica in Montreal, 300kp/h against concrete:

F1 run-off: acres of tarmac, then safer barriers or tire walls.

Is Chilton any good or is he just another Chilton paydriver? I've only seen him in WTCC where he was alright, but not stellar.

Okay, serious question: do these small, private planes have showers? That would probably be the biggest appeal to me.

Bradl will be nowhere near the front rows.

Michael Krumm will be another driver for sure.

Producing the most downforce isn't always the way to go. That's the whole issue. If you run a Monaco package in Monza you will make the most downforce, by far. Will you be the fastest? Nope. I get what you're saying, but in my opinion aerodynamic efficiency is everything. And that's where Red Bull lacked.

The RB10 wasn't the best chassis. The Mercedes was. They were faster through the corners despite going for less downforce. It's a claim they put on to pressure Renault.

I think it's pretty interesting to see that all three cars are fundamentally different. There's the veritable 996 GT3, the road-car based Dumas 997 4.0 GT3 RS and the Cup-based 997 GT3 by Tuthill. Hopefully one of the well developed German championship Porsche's will make an appearance in the WRC too.

I don't think the shape is required. As far as I know they have to have the camera on board, this is just the way they happen to carry it around with. Newey tried trick the FIA by doing a covered version last year, but they intervened because the pictures were rubbish.

Not ignorant at all, just a normal question. They carry a camera that is mandated, and they are employed to act as aerodynamic elements that direct and calm the air towards the car's rear.

And they have uploaded new pics too:

Everyone should watch the Glen.

Pseudo concepts are the worst. Mercedes and BMW are the kings of that foul play.

Eastern Germany was a mess shortly after the regime fell apart. Took so much time and money to rebuild what is 1/4th of the country.

Oh, nevermind then. Interesting beer, never have seen that before.

In the 1980s, when GM was working hard to make their cars ticking time bombs of planned obsolescence, Mercedes-Benz was making cars to last until the day they'd have the technology to reanimate Karl Benz's corpse to show him what a $12,000 hydraulic power window switch looks like.