I think her face actually looks better now. She looks a little more angular than she used to, though-but maybe she's decided to let herself age a bit.

Which is why I TOTALLY DID NOT SAY THAT.

Omg, seriously-I didn't mean there was any reason to get all up in arms. My point was this-we love Louie, and he speaks to a truth that we really, really want to believe. But, the original post (and so many others) fawn on him as if he is perfection in the form of a man.

I don't believe I said anyone should be automatically skeptical of him.

We all love Louie, and yes, he's hilarious and totally right-on...but there's a woman out there who divorced him. So lets not just automagically assume he is all that he speaks, you know?

I understood-I just think you were responding in your own context versus the issue of the original posted article.

How does this article resonate 'sex positive' with you in the least? Do you truly believe that women trolling their local fast food parking lot in order to exchange sexual favors for food equates with a positive outlook on sex in society?

Funny that you hold Chipotle in some higher regard than McDs-but that notwithstanding...I truly don't think we can call it sex work when you're trolling a fast food parking lot. That's just desperation. The point of the article I should've been that its hella sad women have to suck dick for food...shitty or otherwise.

And this is why I question the use of the term 'sex worker' for anyone who happens to trade sex for X thing. It's nice to believe that there could be a way to protect everyone, but if you're handing it out in a McDs parking lot for $3, you probably aren't in a position to unionize and capitalize on a business model.

I suppose I didn't make myself as clear as I thought I did - no, I didn't say that. I said the article was ...oh jesus, you truly can't be this outraged about a damn comment! I'm certainly not interested enough to continue explaining it.

I wasn't hating on the show-I was hating on the analysis in the article.

I think I recall a bajillion years ago when Jane Seymour was first a thing-she was a painter or artist of some sort. Not that it totally legitimizes her or anything.

I was in school during your Gainesville horror (UGA) and it truly was horrific. I am actually surprised you just discovered it, I figured it would be pretty set in town lore. I don't really see the Scream connection though -could that be a bit of legend?

We should all be jumping to give blood, whenever we can. I'm actually a recipient-and I can't donate. It's awesome tat these events spur people into wanting to give for a purpose. But there us always a purpose.

True, but low-end jewelry stores are the jewelry stores of the masses. Kay is huge is the malls of America, and that's where people think you buy jewelry...if you missed the last sale at Macy's.

This new feature makes me happy. Mostly because I know how much it sucks to be on the lookout for some item you really covet. But also because I'm happy to see a little glimmer of hope that Jez can take the giant stick out of its ass and have a light-hearted, lets be happy about something post.

Me too. I'm the epitome of a word nerd who really had that whole experience enhanced by being able to see people speak the words I loved. Im thrilled when people respond to any interpretation, I guess...I just want time and place to matter in some texts. I'm a little too much of a purist in some regard...and I should…

I totally disagree with you because I'm a fan of original practice with Shakespeare. However, I LOVE that any generation feels attached to this, or any other interpretation. I am just happy when people connect to Shakespeare after enduring dry solo reads in middle and high school and deciding they hate it all. I would…

I will see it because my education was a focus in Shakespeare. I will luv it because Christian Cooke is in it.