franklymydearidontgiveadamn
franklymydearidontgiveadamn
franklymydearidontgiveadamn

Well, Jia and all your lovely Jez readers, you have won. You have successfully bullied me into deleting my account and never coming back. I’m sure you’ll all be very happy about that. I find it terribly sad that this community thinks the right thing to do is to harass, judge, lecture and put me down - this is bullying

This is clearly bullying - these people are not just calling me out on what they consider bad behavior (and who are they to decide what is bad behavior - I could say their behavior is bad because of the way they are replying to me) - they are downright mean, insulting, derogatory and attacking my character without

What a lovely thing to say about someone you don't know - judgy much? I cannot believe how nasty people can be

I meant 'now apologized for it' - I know someone will read my typo the wrong way so want to clarify.

Thin skinned? Have you seen the hate thrown my way? Seriously, I hope everyone is really getting their jollies bullying me cause it's pretty gross. This is women coming together? I made a mistake and have no apologized for it about 10 times - what else would you like me to do? Take down my post? I would do so happily

Thanks. Appreciate the support.

And yet another mature response from an author on the site. My god, I thought commenting was supposed to be about discussion and debate and all I get is slammed. How many times do I have to say that I realize now that I used the wrong words to describe what I meant and realize that it came across completely

Does that make you feel better that you are continuing to try and make me feel bad? I hope so - cause it's really unnecessary but good for you for taking another pot shot at me.

No I wont' try again - you believe what you want to believe and continue to judge me if that's what you choose. Just remember you are doing the exact thing to me that you think I did to the women whose story this is.

Thank you - not that you're defending me - but for saying what I didn't have the right words to say. I goofed and I'm being destroyed for it and the author doesn't have the dignity to engage in a discussion but just responds like this. Very sad.

I think the headline is intended to draw people in with a ‘wow’ response only to find out that it’s a sad, sad story about someone’s struggle. I’m not judging and I misspoke by saying I was ‘horrified’ - I meant I was surprised by it because it’s unusual to have an abortion that late - I seriously am not judging - I

Ok - please all calm down - I didn't express myself clearly and I understand why it came across wrong - my intention was to protect the woman because I thought the headline appeared to be vilifying that someone could have an abortion that late. My mistake - please back off - I'm allowed to make a mistake. I'm totally

Wow - I’m just so disgusted by the hate and vitriol that has been thrown at me for one comment - I said something wrong so give me a chance to explain myself before coming at me with such disgusting attacks. I am pro-choice and completely support this woman. I meant that the headline made me think that Gawker was

Wow - really nice way to engage with your readers. What I meant - and clearly I didn't say it correctly so forgive me for not using the exact appropriate words - was that the woman deserves your respect by making the headline clear about the abortion she chose to have - no judgment on my part and I'm deeply saddened

Wow - angry much? I never said anything about good vs bad - what I said was that the headline leads people to believe exactly what you are accusing me of - sort of 'how could someone choose to have an abortion at 32 weeks' and I think she should be able to have an abortion whenever she wants and for any reason. We're

You should change the headline - even if just for this woman's sake - yes, she had an abortion but she did so for a very specific reason and it's click bait to leave the headline as is. I was horrified by the title and then immediately realized it was misleading.

They're not see through? That's the problem I always have - see through or so thin that you can fully see bra and rolls

They're not see through? That's the problem I always have - see through or so thin that you can fully see bra and

Ok then - that was interesting

Your point being..... It's a bill and has gotten nowhere at this point.

It’s written quite well actually and it’s the point that is not made often enough. It’s a shame that politicians and the government in general refuse to look at the real meaning behind the Second Amendment - like they do with every other part of the Constitution - and make it clear it was never intended to mean that