franklombardo
BelovedStump
franklombardo

If thats the case then I think I have dated Kotaku before =(

So much want! You said metroidvania plus Evil Dead and it made my brain explode. How has this never occured to me?.... probably because it is too much of a good idea to ever be a real thing

It’s like “The Last Starfighter” of videogame design

because “manly” is redundant when refering to Fahey

I dont know about you guys, but I needed that

Is it safe to say that if none of the above tickles my fancy, I can keep sleeping or will there be deals aside from what is listed here? Real question, not trying to be a party pooper or anything. Thanks!

Is it safe to say that if none of the above tickles my fancy, I can keep sleeping or will there be deals aside from

Same thing for me

Same thing for me

Beryllium Baloney!!

165 plus tax for me... comes to 173.73, sneaky sneaky Mr. Woot

165 plus tax for me... comes to 173.73, sneaky sneaky Mr. Woot

Great title!

I have the intense urge to wash your mouth with a bar of soap, old-school grandma style

I read that as “the Metroid you want is coming, it’s just not far along enough to talk about, i.e. show you footage/gameplay”

I was wondering this myself. Are you getting the game in the photo or are you getting a copy from a pile they have whose quality is anyone’s guess.

Except for a 2d metroid, or you know... one where Samus is even in the game

I’ve been dying to read your review/thoughts on this game. Do you plan on publishing one on Kotaku? (forgive me if you have addressed this and I’ve somehow missed it)

I think we might be forgetting the obvious parallel here too. On paper I’m sure the Lego Movie sounded, similarly, like a flop and look how that took off. It’s pretty obvious that this style/premise can be wonderful as a vehicle for a thoughtful and fun story (especially when made by people who obviously love the

Sold. Make it so number one

Well, can we both agree that now that Bay has had his go of it and it’s popular again, it would be nice to have some kind of branch off (failure or otherwise) that is THIS, THIS, and a heaping helping of THIS.

The argument you are making is just snowballing from the conjecture that it would have failed. In my, equally as valid opinion, it would not have.