I don't know why I laughed that hard at that, but I did. And it's definitely a sorry not sorry moment.
I don't know why I laughed that hard at that, but I did. And it's definitely a sorry not sorry moment.
Actually, what I find distasteful about this video is that it's INEPT pandering to those actual living people in the "flyover states." It's insulting to their intelligence, some politicos assuming that all it'll take is some faux Lee Greenwood bullshit to secure their votes.
Here's what I wonder: Why do people like you want to be offended? Like you could say, "Hmm, that name sounds questionable. Oh, its about dom/sub sex, not slavery in the United States. Okay, moving on." But instead, because you've gotten a sniff of (fake) racism, you have to go into full blown victim mode...despite…
I feel like I'm missing something here, because I usually agree with your points, and here less so (which, as an aside, I can cope with. We don't always have to agree. I will live on. I am just surprised).
you sound horribly abusive. It was probably with a person like you that mother was in relationship with. *shudder*
Reel it in. Try having a discussion like an adult instead of a 17 year old, weight-lifting Swedish MRA neo-nazi internet troll dude bro.
It always amazes when people are angry about abuse, but then are abusive.
I think your grievance is with the judge (a woman, by the way), not with the NFL.
You mean: you hope he lives in fear of vigilantes.
Two wrongs make a right? Good to know, New York Times.