francescodarcangeli--disqus
Francesco D'Arcangeli
francescodarcangeli--disqus

Sheesh I had apparently wiped that memory out.
Yeah you're indeed right on that one.
The Valenzetti equation might just have sufficed as an explanation :D

…or else?

Well I guess we have to agree to disagree. There's life already throwing too much unanswered questions to be bothered by too open-ish tv shows.
Also, excessive openness reeks of lack of balls on the writers' part or of lack of skill, both "flaws" I have to deal too often on the workplace on a daily basis.
Mind you, I

That's a good point - Lost's authors probably ended up with too much stuff to handle and too little time for it.
That's why I think WP will do better: because they aren't dragging it along too much. The higher you raise expectations, the more you risk frustration and disappointment - if any, writers have learned a

I don't give a fuck about the general opinion, to be honest, and don't be so blindly sure the general opinion about Lost is so unanymous either - maybe it's that way in the USA but not all over the world.
Besides, the anti-lostness the author is talking about is the way "the truth" was handled, which is - precisely -

Hey, we're just halfway through season one, and all we have as proof of the truth are words from two at least ambiguous characters…

I guess nobody really understood what the author meant with "anti-lost"
Fanboyism is really the death of all discussions…

Well, I guess that's just your opinion.
Or are you one of those people who agree with the ratings and common consensus?
For me, it was a good show, but it started sucking immensely from season 5 and season 6 was just a large turd-shaped icing on the cake.