Fearmongering generates views, views get eyeballs on ads, which generates revenue. That’s why everyone on the Internet does it, regardless of actual data.
Fearmongering generates views, views get eyeballs on ads, which generates revenue. That’s why everyone on the Internet does it, regardless of actual data.
I’d say resell it to some other shmuck and pocket the earnings. Buy a new game :P
That’s all fanboys in a nutshell. Reason isn’t their forte
Oh it’s definitely going to flop, and hard. The initial wave of fanboys and scalpers will run out, and then it’ll gather dust until they clearance it out.
Nothing about this game has any sense of continuity or synergy of purpose to it. You can literally skip 90% of the quests, completely ignore base building, and STILL complete the main story.
And the main story is just okay, but hampered by needless roadblocks along the way and what may be the most boring cast of…
I’d be curious as to what you found annoying in TotK. I put 430 hours into it and was engrossed every one of them. Hell, after I finished Starfield and uninstalled it, I went back to play more with TotK :P.
Where are you getting the info about only 50% of players getting their ship? That happens VERY early in the game…
The difference is that BG3 and TotK are *great games*, whereas Starfield is a great concept wrapped up in a mediocre game.
They should be. Starfield’s menu system is fucking AWFUL.
Meanwhile, I found Starfield to be an okay game, but ultimately an epic letdown. At its core, it has a good, interesting story to tell. Unfortunately, it’s hobbled by the awful (and archaic) “Creation” engine, some of the worst UI design I’ve seen in years, and a bizarre focus on covering up all the good parts with a…
No one is complaining about not walking seamlessly around entire planets fast enough. That’s complete nonsense. They’re complaining that walking is the one and only way to navigate the surface of a planet, which is pretty obviously a counterintuitive design choice given, you know, *planetary exploration*, which Mass…
Bethesda should’ve dumped their engine and gone with UE5, full stop.
Gamebryo is basically Tammy Faye Baker: a shrunken head with 200 pounds of makeup plastered on to make it look like it has more substance than it does.
Well, Starfield is no Tears of the Kingdom, but it’s decent. However, my biggest issue with it isn’t the lack of ground vehicles, it’s the artificial gameplay through really lame design choices: poorly designed cities with no maps, mediocre “public transport” that barely moves you anywhere useful, an utterly awful…
Ugh, a mindless hater. Lame.
PlayStation U.
And another ignorant post appears!
The only idiocy is Marxist trolls like you who think some ignorant bureaucrat should decide what’s best for consumers rather than the consumers themselves as they vote with their dollars.
You’re letting ideology rather than evidence guide your point of view.
In an ostensibly (read: not really, but we pretend it is so we can blame capitalism for any and all problems) free market, no company can ever become the neverending sole player in a market, because if it’s free (even free-ish, which is all we really have) then anyone can enter the market and compete. Even everyone’s…
It could after it was integrated into the OS, that's true. Of course, you could always just ignore it and use something else.