Which proves you can’t comprehend what you read unless it reinforces your fantasy, or can be spun in your head in a way to reinforce your fantasy. 

I’d be curious to know what makes you fantasize that, but I know you’ll simply slide back into the circular fantasy if I ask since facts aren’t just irrelevant in your world, they’re down right anathema.

Just remember that with each WiFi device you add to your network, your WiFi becomes a little slower. Especially when those devices are transmitting 1080p video.

Just remember that with each WiFi device you add to your network, your WiFi becomes a little slower. Especially when…

If you honestly advocated for safe driving, you’d admit that your original post was horseshit, and that aggressive following drivers, such as you, create the hazards because of your terrible impulse control and your unsafe behaviors.

If you honestly advocated for safe driving, you’d admit that your original post was horseshit and that lane squatters are a danger in and of themselves, not only because other drivers get irritated and can become aggressive, but because their actions are creating a hazard.

My intelligence and ability to understand not only what I have wrote, but that you are trying desperately to defend your serial lane squatting, is what makes it impossible for me to accept your fantasy reality. Also my firm grip on reality has a lot to do with it too.

Parroting again I see, still in denial though.  No growth for you.  Stay wrong if that’s what you want, just know it reflects poorly on your upbringing.

Ooh look, he can rearrange and regurgitate words from an earlier post of mine back to me. So you can read some words, good. That’s a step in the right direction.

Again, proving my points perfectly. Please, learn to read and comprehend before continuing this if you want to get anywhere beneficial. If you want to continue trying to ignore that you’ve lost the discussion and can’t accept that, that’s fine too, but I’m just going to continue telling you to learn to comprehend what…

Because this is the wrong way to look at adopting EVs. It isn’t just about each individual’s pocketbook, it’s about our children’s futures.

Thank you for continuing to prove my points.

That’s a poorly designed bypass then, at the absolute minimum it should be quicker to use it during congestion; if not Atlanta’s civil engineers need pay cuts post haste.

I don’t think I could have said it any simpler; I’m just going to have to accept that you cannot comprehend words with more than 1 syllable.

After driving a car with a CVT for the first time a few weeks ago I can confidently say I will never voluntarily own a car with a CVT. Ever. They seemed great in theory; they’re absolutely the worst in execution.

In that case, you are unrepentant about being a hazard to other drivers. If you drive in accordance with what you profess, then you refuse to accept the truth of your complicity in creating hazards on the highway.

I wrote them, I know what I wrote, and I know what you are pretending (or maybe you really do believe yourself) to have taken from them. Your stubborn refusal to see truth isn’t my problem with reality. And your insistence to play fantasy dress up with the image of me you’ve fashioned in your head isn’t my problem…

Which attitude is that, my real attitude that dangerous drivers should be ticketed for dangerous driving, or my fantasy attitude you’ve made up where, I guess, I don’t feel that way? You’re a real peach.

I know I’m a fantasy in your head, but ffs man, I’m no God.

Your delusional fantasy persists.  At least you’re good at clinging to things, even if you are terrible at admitting failure, and separating reality from fantasy.  I really have broken you.

I think you’re missing some finer points of this idea. Such as it would stop people that don’t need to drive through the city from driving through the city, it would push those who could use alternatives (but don’t) to use them, and it would stop the remaining inter-city traffic from focusing towards a single road.…