pope was asking 8 euros, jimmy got him down to 5
ForrestCapone111
foreatcapone111
“On the surface, a donation to a private high school might not seem like the most humanitarian act imaginable, but that same donation might help the school offer a scholarship to a financially needy student.”
Not to sound indifferent but I’m currently more interested in seeing how “Trumpcare” treats my sister who needs a new kidney. So far all Obamacare (ACA) has done for her is try to punish her for needing a kidney transplant in the first place (ah ah ah, you are 20 something years old and need a kidney transplant? Its…
Sit down Chris, they moved the chains.
Baylor immediately counter sued contending that Briles is an asshole, who is just as guilty as the university, and should shut the fuck up.
Now playing
A huge Amazon computer component sale, your favorite car charger, and a highly rated hammock lead off Tuesday’s best…
Former MLB Commissioner Bud Selig and executive John Schuerholz will be inducted into the National Baseball Hall of…
Seems harsh since 415 of the texts were just “new phone who dis?”
In 22 years as head coach, Jeff Fisher has 6 winning seasons.
The last one was 8 years ago.
What grinds my gears about this is that all Gawker employees hem and haw about the whole "Well, I'm not really a journalist" mentality they must have as an opening credo upon hiring there. When we think of journalists, historically and contextually, we think of them almost as public servants, as interrogating reality…
Why? The one reason I can see for it in the article boils down to it being a derisive and snarky way to make the same criticism, and you as an employee of Gawker have absolutely zero grounds for trying to tell people not to act in that fashion.
I get why clickbait isn't acceptable to use for some sorts of criticisms, but how do you figure it's not acceptable to use in the case of a misleading headline designed to make people think that a fairly mundane article is not mundane? I take it to mean the same thing. You may not like that it carries with it a much…
They're Journalists when they want to be taken seriously, and Bloggers when criticized for lack of standards.
I believe this article assumes, wrongly, that the Gawker media properties (Gawker, Deadspin, Jezebel, et al) participate in journalism.