foop
foop
foop

As previously stated, insisting something is the case does not actually make it so. You argue like a fucking english major which is to say, badly.

It "Fish Tailed" left, then "Fish Tailed" right, and struck the bridge wall in the right shoulder. It then spun to the left, across all three travel lanes, and struck the Jersey Barrier. It then slid up against the Jersey Barrier backwards in a northerly direction and came to an uncontrolled stop in the median facing

Ahh, fools are so often bitter at the things they don't understand.

Nooooo, it doesn't, and morality goes directly to whether or not the person/people engaging in an act are evil/immoral. You do understand that a moral judgment is a judgement on the character of the person acting, right? If it's not, then it has nothing to do with morality and more to do with intelligence or the

You're really not that smart, are you? Insisting that my plain, clear, and obviously limited statement means something else entirely doesn't actually do anything to effectively assail what I've said, nor does it shore up your position.

They have a great warranty. I'd send it back for repair or replacement. Something as soft as a chicken bone should have posed no issue.

They have a great warranty. I'd send it back for repair or replacement. Something as soft as a chicken bone should

You're confusing being a criminal with being armed and willing to take someone else's life at the drop of a hat. Stop it, it makes you look dumb.

"You are the criminal, aren't you? "

You don't know a gooddamn thing about criminal psychology. Boredom is as likely to be the inspiration behind the theft/criminal act as desperation or anything else. Everything you said above is predicated on your lack of any sort of understanding about what goes through a criminal's head, or doesn't. As such, I'm

As a gun owner, I can tell you that one doesn't just easily become heavily armed and travel around with weapons. I didn't say the criminals having guns wasn't possible, just that everyone getting butt hurt about the fact that they might have had a gun is stupid and overstated. Contrary to popular belief, every

Yes, the daughter is a child in the sense that she is the child of her father. You have absolutely no idea how old she actually is. She could be 21, 25, 30, etc.

Watch the video, the F-150 rams the Audi, not the other way around.

"I don't care whether you think that I'm right or not, if you think that putting your child's life in danger to possibly regain possession of material goods is a perfectly okay thing to do you're wrong, it is as simple as that."

Your assertion that there is something inherently morally wrong and evil about chasing someone down with passengers in the car is retarded. It may be stupid, it may be risky, but it's definitely not on the level of committing an evil act or one of moral turpitude. Any asserting otherwise is the expression of a

So you're just assuming that it was a high speed chase then?

Well shit, this is America, so I guess we're all potentially armed, so no one should ever do anything confrontational.

What part of that footage showed a high speed chase?

1) I don't run around assuming people are armed. Additionally, not all criminals are armed. I'd go so far as to say that the vast majority of criminals out there right now, are not armed.

Most people don't know how to use the english language (especially here, and it's particularly apparent in this case). Most people are fucking stupid, which is also apparent. Additionally, that you think that they were in much actual danger tends to indicate that you belong to one or both of the aforementioned

You're a pansy. They were surrounded by thousands of pounds of aluminum und schteel in a very new and safety oriented vehicle. Do you avoid driving on the roadway due to the horrendous risk? Unless you also try and lecture people on the dangers of driving anywhere on any day, be quiet and quit trying to overstate