You're a pansy. They were surrounded by thousands of pounds of aluminum und schteel in a very new and safety oriented vehicle. Do you avoid driving on the roadway due to the horrendous risk? Unless you also try and lecture people on the dangers of driving anywhere on any day, be quiet and quit trying to overstate…

On what basis do you assume the thief were armed? Aside from pulling that assumption out of your ass, I see no basis for this. Additionally, they're in a big ass Audi A8, not a geo-metro. You'd have trouble convincing almost anyone that they were at much more risk than anyone else that was driving on a normal road…

How the fuck does that have anything to do with morals? It may be unwise, but it's not immoral.

Looks like they were in an A8. Pretty damn safe car. I see no heavy traffic and no firearms were discharged. Is it morally questionable to allow his daughter to drive around in general? There are, after all, many dangers on the road!

"they were definitely on the shady side of moral running down these alleged criminals. "

Um, don't drop it? Yes, the bade is more brittle than a German knife, but it's also much thinner and, to me, more comfortable. I've had my 10" Shun Classic chef's knife for about 12 years now, and a 3.5" paring for about that long, and have never had a single chip in the blade.

Um, don't drop it? Yes, the bade is more brittle than a German knife, but it's also much thinner and, to me, more…

You're defending private use and sale of public property? What kind of asshole are you exactly, aside from exceptionally entitled? Parking spaces should be available for everyone to use, not just the highest bidder.

I've heard lots of tragically bad things about that gen M5. Horrid electrics, engines that decide they're in a bad mood and would like you to pay thousands to have them fixed...

Hey man, some people obviously like the crazy....

If you like dumpy chicks with shitty posture, go to town.

Thanks for the unneeded attempt at an english lesson then, I guess.

"Don't fucking lie when you answer."

Well fuck. Sorry you don't like profanity.

Some parts of my comments were certainly insensitive. However, some folks have no idea how to separate the insensitive bits from the accurate bits and seem to think that me being insensitive about something impacts the veracity or accuracy of what I said. Yes, I am an ass, and I have long known this, but it does not…

Pardon my use of accurate language.

"You immediately pass judgement but then add "some other factor" to reasons this wreck occurred."

I'm showing a lack of sympathy. While I am also showing a lack of empathy, empathy on my part is precluded as I've never been in that situation.

So, your standard argumentative technique is to mis-characterize the nature of the statements made and the entire direction of the argument?

Because common fucking sense? If something does not normally happen given a set of circumstances, it is not unreasonable to assume that it will continue to not happen unless there is another factor or something about the situation is different. If something is the rule, you don't go around assuming every situation…

With modern safety equipment and airbags, a 40 mph, total, collision may kill someone but it is unlikely that both or all parties to an accident would die if they were wearing seatbelts. We also don't know if this was a complete and direct head on collision, or an offset head on collision.