Again, you said "illness", the article says "disorder". And I fail too see anything here that is "picking on men with Autism".
I can understand wanting to reject the dichotomy of neurotypical=good/ASD=bad, but you also used the term "autism spectrum disorder" which is not more prejudicial than what was said in this…

Definitely conflating.

Did we read the same thing? Also the article says "disorders", and not "illness".

I dunno, I'm awake for about 16-18 hours a day, and I like to eat three times during that period, and since those times are usually something like 9:00, 14:00, and 19:00, that does mean eating 5 hours apart.

I actually stopped reading at spoiler alert because I really need to watch this show. Thanks for the reminder.

Tu quoque?

Beating people is not ok. Advocating violence is not ok. Harassing people is not ok. Publishing people's personal information in the internet without their permission is not ok.

Yes, I already said I had misread the article. However, as I also said, it isn't a difficult position to defend, either based on the definition of a hate-group provided by the FBI or SPLC.

FBI: a hate-group's "primary purpose is to promote animosity, hostility, and malice against persons belonging to a race, religion,…

(EDIT: did you mean SPLC didn't list these as hate groups, or AVFM doesn't use harassing tactics?)

Because in the former case, no I'm actually not seeing them on any kind of official list, I misunderstood their the SPLC site and other related material. On the other hand, I don't think it's that hard a position (that…

If quoting from articles on the preeminent MRA website A Voice For Men is selective...

If I recall, Paul Elam and John Hembling (who basically founded the movement) have used tactics of harassing critics by publishing their personal information on the internet. The Southern Poverty Law Center has, in fact, labeled groups like Elam's A Voice For Men as hate groups because of their rhetoric and tactics.

Not really. The people at the forefront of the MRM are the ones advocated extreme, misogynistic positions though. Paul Elam, and his successor John Hembling have, publicly, said some very awful things.

Because we are primates who seem to have an innate sense of fairness, and many people just find it upsetting when someone spends as much money on a plane ticket as millions of people make in a year, even in the relatively affluent United States.

There is a lot of resentment against lavish spending, especially after…

Yeah, I'm seriously in the dark about this. But I think I'm probably also not equipped to understand the economic/cultural context that produced the "lean in" phenomenon.

Feels. I gotta get out of this wasteland.

You get a star. Fortunately, most of the comments seem to be reasonable, and not totally dismissive. Hopefully some dudes with cogitate on this shit and not have knee-jerk reactions defending institutionalized sexism.

I wish this was hyperbole, and not something a fucking pastor said, and then had his whole congregation act like he wasn't saying that.

That's fair.

You do realize this is happening in other comments right?

I'm not totally sure why you think Jezebel "wants" what you think it wants. or what "Jezebel" means in this context.

The preview frame really looks like the JFK assassination ... :(