flyingsaucers
flyingsaucers
flyingsaucers

If anything, Easter Eggs are almost never in plain sight. Like the Statue of Happiness' heart in GTA IV. Also, there's no official definition for what characteristics an Easter Egg has to conform too. If a dev. puts something in the game for fun and calls it an Easter Egg, then it's an Easter Egg.

WHy do they call it the xbox 360? Cuz you take 360 degress and walk away.,

Can you imagine "doing" the thing during the other thing?

You must be the life of the party.

The aftermath of a Leno joke is worse than the actual joke. Although Letterman and Conan and all those "late night" hacks do it too, its awfulness is somehow magnified when Leno does it ahhem myuck heh heh yeh -shakes head apologetically-

How could you possibly not get this joke? Unless you've never played or heard of video games before?

Lol @ "Ubisoft provided modding tools." Ubisoft provided nothing. Modders used hex editors to alter the game's code. Again, the issue is that it's an incredibly obvious and simple feature that Ubisoft overlooked once, then seemingly learnt their lesson, then - amazingly - overlooked it again in the expansion. Also it

At this point, it makes no difference. I'm done with the game for the foreseeable future, as are most who preordered or played on release. This one feature isn't enough incentive to play through Blood Dragon again at this point in its life cycle.

Wow and it only took how many months for them to patch in a feature that fans of FC3 were calling for since the release of that game?

This comment is the nerdiest thing I've ever seen in my life, and I've seen some shit.

And Starcraft, too. Blizzard is the true pioneer of the interlocking narratives of multiple protagonists.

Interesting how you inserted a superlative into my statement. Where do you see anything remotely akin to "we should never" do anything in my original comment? I was commenting on this particular incident, not every incident ever. Which I think is pretty clear?

Amazingly, I possess the ability to focus on two different entities simultaneously.

I have a hard time believing that this O'Malley guy is blameless. How could he not foresee the inevitable misuse of his "satirical joke." This is a notoriously immature and vitriolic group of people you're dealing with, and the irony of his "joke" is pretty damn opaque.

The word "fright" in no way implies "just a scare." Your phraseology is completely bonkers. Fright = fear. Fear which the passengers of a crashing airplane experienced. The word "fright" does not imply "fear without good reason" and I can't imagine why anybody would think that it does.

Sorry, but none of those quotes indicates that you are supposed to enjoy DLC more than the actual game.

Where in this article does it say that you're supposed to enjoy the DLC more than the original game? The point is that DLC can be an exciting addition to the game, not a favorable alternative. What exactly are you disagreeing with? Not ignoring your other "stupid comment," I think you need to work on your reading

As Grymnir mentioned, the "no class action" clause is almost certainly not legally binding. This is basically common knowledge at this point. In the same way a company can issue a patent which will almost certainly be struck down in court ( Apple's patented "rectangular device," for ex.), a company can also write a

1. The title of the article is "Every Game Would Be Better With Blink From Dishonored." Keywords being "Blink From Dishonored."

Meh, just because you cant envision an alternative does not mean its impossible. I love it when fans of a flawed series will defend the flaw with the old "couldn't be done any other way" argument. No, see, it can be done better - you just lack the imagination and/or creativity to make it happen.