flyfunner5
flyfunner5
flyfunner5

Did you just ASSUME a conservative could read? How dare you.

“In fact, there were no new federal restrictions...”

“As a person who has had to use a gun to protect themselves you people know nothing until you’re in that situation and your life depends on it. I’m an engineer...”

Huh. Funny. I’m also an engineer. I grew up around guns. I also never hunted.

Anecdotal evidence provided by the NRA is not evidence. It is just porn for gun nuts.

You are more likely to kill yourself or someone you know with your gun than ever using it to defend yourself in a truly life-threatening event.

No one is for it. They are pointing out hypocrisy when they see it. If schools with fucking children are “safer” with guns than why aren’t rallies and speeche? Unless of course, the more guns makes everyone safer is complete bullshit.

Shouldn’t Trump feel safer with so many “good guys with guns” there to stop any “bad guys with guns?”

What else do you constantly carry around in the extreme remote chance you’ll need it? Snake anti-venom, a parachute, life preserver, roll of toilet paper, etc?

now, now, stop raining on his “guns are great” anecdote...

When a whacked out person is bent on killing you and your friends and the only thing standing between you and getting killed is pulling that gun and using it, it’s a different thing.

He can’t because Congress doesn’t allow federal agencies to collect and investigate such data.

“I’ve never been a hunter but respect the sports and see hunters as good stewards of the land unlike us city slickers that go into the woods and leave their trash all over and call our selves environmentalists

Fail English me did? That unpossible!

Could you link us to stats of how often a privately armed citizen stops a crime in progress?

No one is really criticizing the decision here. Of course the event will be safer without guns, you’re right that someone may use it to try to harm the President.

Unfortunately the Federal Election Committee has been banned from studying the effects of gun advocacy groups on election results.

*circle-jerk of people

one idiot liberal, whom hate guns so much(!)

LaPierre likes to talk up how valuable the NRA is to campaigns and other things despite literally no evidence to back this up. But when has this circle of people ever relied on evidence?