fluxuate27
Nick
fluxuate27

Everything in this article is true, but it still comes down to the fact that Apple replaced a great product for a shitty one. Which, especially in today's fast-paced world, is unacceptable.

RIGHT? FINALLY! what is this, 1999? Turn-by-turn navigation has been around FOREVER! I didn't know it WASN'T a feature!

Fail.

So Apple releases a Beta product once again. No one really expected Apple Maps to be the same quality as Google Maps, but something presentable would have been nice. This is just insulting.

The IT crowd likes android more than iphone for many reasons, just one being customization. Yes, I mean widgets, and backgrounds, and ring tones. And I think it also stems from the fact that Apple is historically a non-customizable company. From computers to ipads to iphones, it's always been their way or nothing,

Any pharmacy (or anyone worth going to) can link your new prescription refill to the prescription you are currently using. They often don't, because it takes a bit longer, it's usually pretty busy, and most people don't even know about it. But if you specifically ask to link your prescription they will. That way, all

As a consumer? even more insulting than the "upgrade" that was the 4s....which was Siri, which could have rolled out to all iPhone 4's if it weren't for an Apple-included locked code.

So the overall advantage of the iPhone5 vs the 4s is.... a screen that is 1 row of icons larger, and now you have to buy all your accessories over again?

Welcome to Apple. Where you pay extra money for no reason. Really though, what did you expect? was there any real reason for switching connectors other than more money? I think not.

I have to say, I always go back to Swiftkey, but it is pretty laggy (I can't ever type my normal speed), It automatically closes at even the slightest swipe (very annoying when it closes mid-word, also when I'm typing too fast), if often misses or deletes whole words at random when I type too fast, and it has

I've always known "organic" doesn't mean more nutrition, just less pesticides and antibiotics... not trying to be "that guy", but I really thought that was common knowledge.

it takes about 12 years to get a compound released as a drug. Most articles like these are talking about something that might not have even entered the pipeline to becoming a drug yet. So even if it does make it to become a drug, we won't see it for 10 years at least.

Now playing

Well a big part of it is the recent Supreme Court ruling that allowed the so-called "penalty" for not having insurance go through as a tax. That way a bunch of peoplewill get insurance, and a bunch of people will just be paying the government for not having insurance, money which the government is SUPPOSED to put back

Hospitals charge so much for services because a crapload of the people that go to hospitals just don't pay them, so they struggle to just break even. Most hospitals don't, and those that do often have a 3-5% profit margin. So, if everyone had insurance, prices would go DOWN, because then hospitals would actually get

This is pretty sweet. A new way to test toxicity studies would be incredibly useful, rather than just using rats and rabbits and then guessing.

The problem is, good doctor or bad doctor, stuff just gets overlooked all the time. People often have multiple doctors (the primary care and multiple specialists), AND when people go to the hospital, things can get really interesting. You wouldn't believe how often someone is put on something in the hospital, or given

haha thanks!

True, when I was learning about cancer in school, only a few months ago, it astounded me just how much adaptation cancer cells have developed. Sometimes it seems like evolution. Yes they are incredible destructive to the human body, but I often found myself in pure awe at the pure biological efficiency.

Pharmacists are stepping into the very role you're speaking to. Still very much in it's infancy, MTM programs, as well as the more-traditional "brown bag" programs, address this very issue. These programs help get rid of unneeded medications, among other things. Because the field of Pharmacy is rapidly expanding

i wonder if this is just a result of certain drugs on certain kinds of tumors, or a pretty universal occurance. I'd be interested to see research with other compounds on a wider variety of cancers.