Criticizing Jill Stein is internalized or external misogyny, depending on the critic’s gender!!!

That’s how this works, right? I’m just going by what I’ve seen with Hillary so far.

From Wikipedia.. well cited.

Unlike methylmercury, ethylmercury has not been found to bioaccumulate. The toxicity of ethylmercury is not well studied - exposure standards based on methylmercury (such as those currently recommended by the United States Environmental Protection Agency) have not been demonstrated to be…

This article allows people to feel comfortable to shit on the Green party and asuage their conscience that, “ya know what, we really do have to support Hillary.” Jill Stein is not an anti-vaxxer. She’s describing why some people are anti-vaxxers and said we should address why some people become anti-vaxxers.

I found her responses sincere and forthright. Thimerosal/mercury in vaccines + rushed dosing schedules are the big issues concerning vaccines. These can put a large burden on developing children. And it’s true that changes to these systems are being implemented. Beyond that, vaccines are tried and true. They shouldn’t…

You all should be ashamed: http://www.snopes.com/is-green-party…

I market vaccines for a living. She is saying vaccines are medicine. Medicines are powerful, and have adverse event profiles and need to be regulated by an independent regulating body. These are all true statements.

My puny brain picture this as....

So even after the poll, that science people could choose another name? Who do they think they are, the electoral college?

Uh, one question though. Why is this a thing? Maybe I’m just old fashioned but if I want to know the weather, I either open the weather app, or if I’m super lazy, ask Google Now. And it tells me everything I need to know. If I want to buy something, I open my browser and buy the thing. This is just such pointless shit.