Yeah, right:

I vote Labour. Always have, always will. So I have no love for either of the candidates. But for the Tory party to have a woman at its head (something socially-progressive Labour has never managed) is massive. Reactionary, sexist old Tories. And she’s going to be the second-ever female PM, in the near-300 years of the…

Um, Syrian groomless weddings? German parliament no means no legislation? Do you read Jezebel? It deals with women’s issues. This is a massive deal, and just because it didn’t make the NYT doesn’t make it non-notable.

And since typing that we’ve had two more articles come up ... on lingerie and a comic book character. Good grief. Politics only matters when its US politics, it seems.

But they weren’t being reported ... instead there was trash and trivia. Whereas news to do with women achieving world leader status is old news - seven hours since it was announced - and still nothing on Jez.

Ah, you have a bigger heart than me

Yep, but the world’s 5th largest economy getting a female leader might be of interest? Or are the Yanks as isolationist and inward looking as we all suspected?

C’mon Jezebel. A few hours ago it was announced that the leadership contest for the Tory party in the UK - and thus the position of Prime Minister - was between two women.