A water jet can cut through things. Who are the people who need to continually watch videos to demonstrate this fact?

“If Drew ever hands you one of his business cards, drop everything and find yourself a record player”

The internet is fucking stupid.

Thanks!

Anyone know who else is on Trump’s council? Is there a list?

“But I thought that Wikileaks/RT/Greenwald/Snowden were on MY side!”

Meh, just brings us back to my very first point:

Here, US govt report on how they investigated the hacks and came to the conclusions they did:

Yeah, but then I’d have to watch a video.

Our society has much too much time on its hands.

Couldn’t that visual effect be achieved with any number of objects? Why an iphone I wonder.

(eye roll) Dude, I don’t care about you enough to bother making up lies about you.

I have seen the so-called “main street media” mention every one of those things, including demands to show the evidence. I have also seen Congressmen stating that the evidence should be released.

“Simply a discussion of the evidence and explanation of the accusations.”

Here are some articles about the security firms that first fingered the Russians for hacking, that summarize the methods used to make that identification. And a report from one of the firms.

They are reporting the evidence that points to Russia. I’m not going to read all the articles for you. Go read them. If you trust Vice, then read Vice. Just don’t come here and say “there is no evidence” just because the head of the CIA hasn’t personally walked you through it in his office. There are lots and lots…

I’ve seen many accounts of how the hacking took place and what they say points the finger towards Russia. I personally don’t expect the CIA to open up their books to the public and show us all the documentary evidence. If that is your standard, than you basically can not believe any story about the government or…

“Gingrich visited her in the hospital to dictate the terms of the divorce”

Precisely. The demand for more and more evidence is actually a pretty easy partisan dodge that can go on forever. Glenn Greenwald is the ultimate example. Since he isn’t standing in the room when the Russians do something, he can simply insist forever that whatever evidence is presented is insufficient.

The most interesting, and I think under-reported, aspect of this whole thing is how much Theranos was just replicating the blustery start-up business model that thousands of other companies are using. Basically, you sell the tech you plan your company to create but pretend like you’ve already done it.