Small pee pee.

That’s what I said, Mrs. Dash.

People are telling you “that’s the way it is, for the safety” while ignoring the fact the plug itself could be designed to stop power-flow as it’s pulled out.

I am a strong 2nd amendment guy, but I think requiring transfers to go through a background check is reasonable.

This is a lot of work for not grinding your own beans.  

This is a lot of work for not grinding your own beans.  

Did he botox his forehead?!  

I’m very confused as to why a locking plug is required. 

Nah. 17 year old’s know better. If she didn’t, she should have, and being that it was only 10 years ago, she’s not fit for the job.

It should be noted that most of the top 4 aren’t really noted for making their money from roads, especially not directly- Gates, Zuckerberg, Warren. If anything Gates and Zuckerberg are allowing people to drive less to work and socialize and stand to gain more by people driving less. You could argue that Bezos makes…

Nice.  Thanks for the heads up.  I’ve forwarded it to the user with the 2011. 

This is what a user named Sven just replied to me:

I mean, this sounds like what we already do with the addition of EV taxes; which is counter productive to your green initiatives. It just further confuses the problem and allows for the rich to hide behind more complicated tax code.

Ok, lots of back and forth here. Let’s reset on one thread.

The rich/poor argument might be the only reasonable way to explain why roads might be good to be equally taxed. However, it doesn’t work and is short sighted, IMO.

It’s not an argument about if we should have roads, it’s how to pay for them.

However, with roads there are tons of folks that use them to run their business - this is arguably everyone, but some much more than others. Trucking companies, long distance contractors, everyone that drives 100 miles each way to work every day.

Roads don’t benefit everyone equally.

People aren’t profiting off the schools or kids.

Because a lot of folks don’t even have cars. Or in my case, I don’t want to pay for infrastructure for those who drive 50k miles a year in heavy and/or giant vehicles when I only drive a few thousand in my car?

This sounds like a rant from a person that talks about the good ol’ days and how new fangled things are just too darn complicated. I have a hankering that some cylinder deactivation systems are bad, but that they are mostly good. I just don’t know enough about them and their reliability to firmly say so. I mean,…