So you know how everything ends then? Because if you don’t, it’s pretty idiotic to say that anything whatsoever serves no purpose. It could very well be that the server at the third dinner sits on the Iron Throne. You don’t know.
So you know how everything ends then? Because if you don’t, it’s pretty idiotic to say that anything whatsoever serves no purpose. It could very well be that the server at the third dinner sits on the Iron Throne. You don’t know.
And yet again the overly puckered asshole of the internet gets it’s way.
And only about 3 years too late to matter! At least the timeline is getting shorter for “duh why didn’t we launch with this?” decisions.
Well this puts Kotaku in a bit of a pickle. You push ultra liberal social issues any chance you get yet here is an example that could hit your wallet. So how does that work?
The issue is there is no recourse. The media holds the power to decide things in a single video or article. If a dev feels slighted (correctly or not) they can...take it to fans. That requires an immense amount of time and going all over the internet to attempt to clean their reputation.
Different strokes I guess. I lock on and it switches enemies if I swing the camera around. If I don't lock on I play this weird game of whack a mole where Noct swings and misses those dog things that pop up everywhere about 3/5th of the time. So I can 1) miss most swings 2) switch enemies all the time 3) not see what…
Well I went to school and we didn't have weighted GPAs above 4.0 because going above 100 makes no sense. So I guess my source is me. Should I cite MLA style? Maybe APA?
Edit: I see my points covered elsewhere. You're full of crap. 4.2s didn't exist when I graduated in 2001. The rest makes you sound a lot younger than 38 also.
When your combat and movement systems are infuriating, the meat is already spoiled. I can tolerate framerate problems, it's the fact that nothing at all seems to work well that concerns me. I'll go through it at least once more but my initial impression is pretty negative. Why demo at all if you have nothing worth…
Whole thing felt very sloppy. The game needs a ton of polish before I'd pick it up, beyond where standard demos lie. Framerate drops, the other 3 characters either not fighting at all or getting in the way, no way to tell how difficult an enemy is until you attack, a lock on system tied to camera movement so if you…
I may be the only person to shrug his shoulders at this. I don't mix politics and games, nor should anyone. It's a GAME after all. My opinions about police have their place. I don't vote for the candidate that played Mario and I don't avoid games over some silly notion about cops behaving badly (silly as in it makes…
What a bloated piece of self fellation. Did you have some point to this piece? Because I lost it somewhere in the multipage complaint written like some quickly scrawled college intro course on rambling like Chuck Palahniuk sans humor 101. See that last sentence? Your entire mopey blog post reads like that.
If she's a veteran, I'm a legendary game god for that Doom wad I made in 96. That isn't even disrespect, the woman has made one moderately successful indie game. That isn't veteran status.
I...don't find some of those to be true. Female enemies are pretty much never sexualized. I can't even think of a game I played where that was the case. At all.
Are you insane? Tell me how a business that isn't making a profit works. Profit has to be the focus because that's how paychecks get signed.