It’s still a pretty wobbly lookin simulation, I’d have expected it to at least be as “graceful” as a lunar landing from the Apollo program.

I know this was launched a while ago, but compared to a controlled landing of Blue Origin or SpaceX rockets (Especially the hard and fast landings), that looks positively juvenile.

And there’s the target. It’ll pay for itself in under a week based on time savings once they are used to it, and then clients will want to purchase them too.

Yes, this please.

Another factor to consider is latitude though. The closer a launch is to the equator, the easier it is to reach orbit. The linear speed at the equator for instance is 785 miles per hour compared to the geographic poles where it is zero mph.

we import it. duh

I’m in total agreement with you here. Shadow Fortress would have been absolutely perfect as a name.

Annnnd thats how I feel on my birthday...

Ugh... seriously...

I’ll drink to that.

I’d argue that racing has been, is, and always will be dangerous. Is it better, orders of magnitude yes, but even today we’re still arguing for instance the open cockpit design of F1 vs a Halo vs Windshield vs fully closed. As long as a human is in the vehicle, or even near the track, racing will always be dangerous.

That camouflage pattern looks particularly British 

Ugh, guess I’ll show up perhaps

nice counterpoint

Here’s the thing though, if we knew there were multiple Batsuits for different kinds of “missions” like we know there are, then a “Tactical” Batsuit or “Stealth” Batsuit or other kinds of suits actually makes sense. Assuming that even Batman must make compromises with how things are optimized, it wouldn’t be that…

Idk, they should just put Tesla style superchargers at all the Buc-ee’s, I can definitely get lost in there for 30 minutes at a time.

Only if you get too far from Austin

Now this. This is what I want to see.

Oh, well now I do... Physics is an asshole though.

Meh, I don’t believe you.