Impressive, but if twitter says 1:06, it must be true lulz

I see a sensitive snowflake.

Regarding a formal Bruins-initiated contract, sure. The rest is claptrap to the point that Ghouliani could have created it. Good luck in life with that, you’ll need all you can get.

ditto

Are you for realsies? Is this a ruse, or is the bar to participate in society really this low in that heckhole?

Fortunately, the appreciation of someone of your mettle is worth about as much as your opinions related to concussions and hockey. AKA: nothing more than something to mock.

Yeah, there’s a hidden camera or something around here.

This is a joke, right? This has to be a joke. Even the most self-unaware Bruins fan can’t be this bad.

Am I on candid camera or something? Compared to you, a black hole is full of hot air.

LOL yeah, reading for comprehension.  

Sorry, I am not good at typing slow enough to be understood by deflecting Mass stereotypes. Good day, good luck, you’ll need it.

He still had terms. The link you posted (SI can be iffy, I admit) said he had not committed and had advised this to interested teams (“significant interest” per the link). Or maybe just like the concussion and injuries, it is all a ruse, all fake news, all lies. Just washed up, injuries and concussions and the risk…

Oh geez. I can’t keep up with your idiocy, that’s for sure. Of course he doesn’t, he’s retired. But he definitely was under terms as he wasn’t playing for free, and people with much more insight than you’ll ever possess into the mechanics and business of the game thought it was a workable deal. But maybe you know…

I never said you needed to play in the NHL (although I sincerely doubt you are working as a scout at any level). Almost like a strawman, but not as insightful. Reading for comprehension will help you in life.

I am saying you are flapping your gums relentlessly about events where you have no real insight, where your opinion will always be foolish and mockable. Effectively accusing him of faking his issues because he is “no longer good at hockey”, it is both amusing and astounding.

Who said anyone owed him anything? All signatories to his contract were there of their own free will. Who are you to judge why he isn’t playing now? Oh! I know the answer to that. Funny you call him “Washed up” yet were no doubt excited under year ago with no such whiny oblivious sentiment.

Yet here you are mentioning their names, bender.

No place is perfect, especially in the devolving Murkan idiocracy, but I’ll take what I’ve got over your gongshow. Thanks

LOL armchair fans have 20/20 hindsight, you’re right there. Right now it seems just awful. But I am sure you thought he was “no longer good at hockey” from the start, and you can easily judge his motives in 11 games out of a 1000+ game career. Yep.

The Bruins had no problem taking him in trade, even with the clear potential of having risks associated with age and prior injury. Maybe they didn’t think he was “no longer good at hockey” either. But if that’s the hill you want to die on, be my guest. I am sure you can teach us all a thing or two.