fetchhappened
fetchhappened
fetchhappened

I’m more unhappy with Thiel than Hogan. Hogan feels he has cause to bring action, fine, he has that right. But Thiel’s bankrolling it AND getting Hogan’s attorney to make it so it can’t be paid by insurance, that’s some evil shit designed just to destroy Gawker Media. And Thiel’s doing it out of sheer personal grudge,

Lesbian shitasses, Lentils, all of the gifs...WHERE ELSE AM I SUPPOSED TO MAKE THESE JOKES?!?!

Heck, spin off Millihelen and make it easy—maybe tie in Pictorial

Ziff-Davis looks like it wants Jezebel and Gizmodo (and why not LifeHacker, Deadspin, etc.) but has no real interest in keeping Gawker itself. I think that would be a smart move. (Also, giving IO9 its independence from Gizmodo again would be great.)

Bring it in, ladies

A man can have a documented history of violence, yet people still describe him as “sweet” and “gentle” and somehow incapable of perpetrating violence AGAIN. Yet, a woman with texts and photographic evidence of abuse is lying.

It really sounds like the parents are upset that Sara’s got a pretty strong backbone despite the fact that they’ve been trying to break her will. The girl came out in Texas, against her ultra conservative parents will. The parents are too ignorant and stubborn to realize how great of a kid they’ve got despite the way

Heartlight seems to take the ‘loving’ Christian position that homosexuality is just not a real thing. So, it’s not about her sexuality. It’s about her mental health, her ‘offensive choices’, her ‘sinful activities’ and ‘a lifestyle that God warns against’.

The Austin-American Statesman spoke to Sarah’s mother, who confirmed Sarah was sent away, but strongly denied it was for being gay: “It has nothing to do with her sexuality.” She said Sarah would be “heartbroken” if she knew she was “being misrepresented in this way.”

“Your teen needs to know they are safe and loved, regardless of their lifestyle choices or beliefs,”

The smell of bullshit coming from the “ministry”is strong. One day after a social media outcry here and Twitter and who knows where else, they suddenly announce she has left? Whatever, no one buys it. But at least she’s out of that shit hole.

Her council seems confident in the applicability of my definition. That’s his job. I am confident in the existence of my definition, and still don’t give a shit about jurisdictions no matter how many times you use the word “specific”. The OP called the idea that this is rape“fucking idiotic” (Again, no mention of

The OP said “And for the love of god, this isn’t rape. Shady, yes. Shitty, yes. Rape, no. Fuck no. Don’t be a fucking idiot.” which implies the belief this could never be considered rape. They didn’t talk about jurisdictions and neither did I. They dismissed the mere possibility of classifying it as rape entirely; I

I was a cop a couple of hundred years ago. Did you know lawyers bill by the hour? I had one lawyer keep me in court for an entire day asking me stupid questions about whether or not there might have been someone else driving the puke-covered car that his puke-covered client fell out of the driver’s side of on camera.

It’s right there in the definition. Deception.

I’ve been raped and I find your comments to be disgusting. So yeah, fuck off.

She fucking tried to kill herself right after it happens and you want to quibble about the definition of rape? What is wrong with you?

As someone who has been raped, go fuck yourself with a hard and sharp object, you disgusting piece of shit. You are the only thing that is disgusting to victims.

As a rape victim, you can spare us the righteous indignation. You clearly don’t understand the concept of rape enough to speak for us.

A cop trying to shoot the tires is more likely to miss, ricochet a bullet off the pavement, and send fragments flying down the street at a very dangerous angle. If someone is posing that much of a risk with their vehicle, there’s more than enough justification to shoot the driver.