He has a movie coming out, right? So this is his sad attempt to clean up his image? Two seconds of googling reveals this guy has always been a nasty psycho, even when he was young. I wouldn’t pay a penny to see him in anything, nor would I pay to see anything he directed (I might pirate it, tho.)

Gibson’s best response would to be gracious just like when the late Sen. Robert Byrd was continually confronted by his KKK past, “I know now I was wrong. Intolerance had no place in America. I apologized a thousand times ... and I don’t mind apologizing over and over again. I can’t erase what happened.”

The Clinton audible means the ball is going to the left.

Diana Moskovitz is a treasure. Her reporting on the legal issues tranversing professional sports and the system are excellent.

Hi! Sorry, long day. The jury breakdown was six women and two men. Baute, Rose’s lawyer, described their race as seven who were white and one who was Hispanic.

And here he is stretching out his hands:

“I felt like if she felt like she had been raped, she would have told me,” Lavergne said.

“Hi! It looks like you’re trying to run an A-2 Gap Slant? Would you like help running an A-2 Gap Slant?”

Finally a pro scout recognizes Tebow as a quarterback.

Husky and Starch

Guy hitting .205 in High-A ball is worried about the wrong Mendoza.

Comments like these are infinity more boring than the stories are.

What if the author chose not to link her identity with her writing precisely to avoid that kind of analysis? This insistence that an author’s biography can reveal deep and meaningful truths about their work tends to result in the pigeon-holing artists who are not white men.

And we have reached the climax of a year long foreplay session. Thank you

What I don’t get is why someone would protest the Anthem of the Country that allows him to make millions of dollars absolutely no money playing Football in the first place. If he really wanted to make a difference he’d donate some of his salary room and board to inner city charities.

No kidding. Sports *again*?!

Haha. This.

I like that judge. Seems to be walking that line fairly well where neither party is given too much leeway. It is a trial about rape so no matter who is right and wrong it is awful, but this seems to be a little less awful than most of them.

Yeah. That’s true. But more importantly, it’s the defendant making the statements, not an out of court declarant. It’s not hearsay in the first place.

“So should I delete your number...”