fernyvr-4
Turbo-Brick
fernyvr-4

I bought one of those when it was on sale for $150, and it does a decent job. My sole issue with it is that it generally does not seem to contain the shavings well. I end up with hair all down the front of my shirt every single time I shave, even if I thoroughly cleaned the thing from the prior use.

I bought one of those when it was on sale for $150, and it does a decent job. My sole issue with it is that it

I'm going to have to disagree with part of your statement. Yes, the average Joe doesn't need a suppressor, or a 30 round mag, or a weapon capable of fully automatic firing. I can agree with you on those points.

If the guy was willing to scream obscenities at a passing car (someone whose only crime was being in the wrong place at the wrong time) for simply letting him know that they were coming, I can't imagine how he'd react to someone offering unwanted advice on how to get out of the drift. Just because I'm a nice guy

When I was in the market for my Subaru, I knew I wanted to order the vehicle, not just take one off the lot. Not only was my color, configuration, and 'trim' combination fairly rare, but it also saved me from having to worry about how the car was treated prior to me getting my hands on it.

This. $20, they provide the drain gasket and oil filter, and I provide the oil I want them to use. I have a paper-trail in case anything goes wrong.

I have lots of bugs on the front of mine, does that count?

It's both really amusing and really depressing to read the comments on pro-Russia sites like RT. People will believe just about anything....

Maybe it wasn't intentional, but I think indifference is just as indicative of a terrorist mindset. If they didn't care what they're shooting at (assuming for the moment that they are the ones responsible), are they really any better than the people purposefully targeting civilians? Personally, I don't think so.

I've driven a Model S P85, and while it was different enough to be considered a unique experience, I wouldn't call it 'hard'. It has a accelerator pedal, a brake pedal, and a steering wheel. They generally function the same as they do in regular gas-powered automobiles.

Seems contradictory to ban driver aids like ABS and traction control, standard on every new vehicle sold in America, and simultaneously claim that your cars are relevant to their road-going brethren? Why even bother pretending?

One of us...

If they're trying to develop technology that will eventually filter down to road cars, why not start with some technology that's actually in road cars?!?! Adaptive suspension, active aerodynamics, tires that don't spontaneously disintegrate, ABS, traction control, etc.

I'd be interested in reading that article/report as well, if you wouldn't mind linking it when you find it. I work in sales/operations for a good-sized CNC machine shop that does some supplying for defense contractors, medical companies, and others, and the conclusion that we've come to about the Kanban/just-in-time

How does the ride quality compare with the 2015 WRX? Is it still stiffer and harsher?

Better car for the track maybe. For commuting, the WRX is probably the better bet. I just sat in a 2013 WRX today (buddy is buying one), and I was amazed at how much more comfortable the ride was than my 2013 STI....

Solution:

Can I answer 'neither' without sounding like a douche? Not trying to avoid the question, just don't like either of those vehicles.

This isn't the first time I've seen someone mention that the Supra's have a lot of 'character', but I don't understand what that's supposed to mean. What is 'character'?

What amuses me is the assumption by certain people that hitting a moving target from even hundreds of miles away is an easy feat, let alone thousands. You have to find your target first, which is more difficult than it sounds.

No STi since the GD platform was developed with motorsports in mind from the get go. So I am not surprised that the new ones are presenting the same issue.