It’s a video (or, if you turn the sound off, a very long gif):

Sounds more like he was Voluntold to leave.

You forgot how many storm troopers he killed on Endor.

SO much more money for settlement payments!

Ezekiel Elijah Elliott

I mean, it is Porsche. Their entire corporate strategy is to sell people on spending $50k more than they were originally going to.

From Elliott’s point of view I entirely buy this. From Jones’ point of view? I think it would take planning, and I don’t entirely buy that he’s capable of it. Nonetheless, it’s the sort of stupid drama he seems to thrive on.

If the franchise tag is tied to position, maybe rookie contract length should be too.

The gameplay was great but those games also had great soundtracks. It’s amazing how much a soundtrack can improve a game. 

Dogs named Ruffell Wilson and Paw Paw Clinton-Dix are safe for now.  As is Tom Brady since he’s already a fancy dog named Tom Brady. 

“The Texans went __-__ before crapping out in the Wild Card game in embarrassing fashion last season” is an inevitable truth right up there alongside “death” and “taxes.”

Note to self: after you hit your 100 game parlay, buy the Colts, in the cover of night move them to Mexico where they belong, and erect a wall outside the stadium to keep Mike Pence out, DO NOT allow GM to trade multiple future first round picks for middling talent. 

The Texans are also paying near half of Clowney's tag for him to play in Seattle. Even if you wanted to argue that the moves themselves make sense, the way they were done is a total clownshow.

My next dog will certainly be named Barkevious. That’s a Holiday Rambler Promise™.

“Well, this very classy goal in the Bundesliga is one thing, but I just don’t think we can ignore the importance of Jozy’s hold-up play.”-a weirdly large segment of American soccer media and probably the USMNT coaching staff.

Pretty sure the ads are served based on the cookies in your browser. So maybe it’s just a wake-up call from internet jesus.

It's interesting to me when people oppose food taxes by saying the government is trying to influence what you eat. Yes, it is, and do you know why? Because eating healthy saves lives and tax payer money. Their decisions, while not perfect, are at least partially based on recommendations from health professionals.

There are plenty of studies that show high consumption of sugar is detrimental. By that logic coffee, tea, and caffeinated soda should be wicked expensive since caffeine is technically a drug.

Then I am supposing you're against taxing alcohol?

It's not specifically because it's inexpensive, though — it's because it's damaging to health.