@DennyCraneDennyCraneDennyCrane:To be honest, Denny Crane, I'm surprised they didn't mention the cesium-137 detected in the water, as well. Along with trace amounts of plutonium. Sure iodide makes up the largest chunk of radioactive material, but then, as you explained, it is only a temporary concern. Cesium-137…

Why no mention of the detected cesium-137 in the water being released?

How did my gun-toting friends not already invent this? They love dogs -and- guns; so, why have they never combined both in such a whimsical way?

They seem most concerned with the fact that any attacks by Anonymous would probably just inconvenience PS3 gamers more than cause any actual damage to Sony. So, they don't trust that Anonymous will do something meaningful; instead, they see a pattern of destructive and reckless behavior from Anonymous which leads…

To me, Anonymous's greatest flaw as a meaningful force for any cause is its general unwillingness to compromise or accept questions to its motivations and actions. It feels it is right and there is no room for doubt or skepticism.

Sorry if you were offended, but my point was merely to show the misrepresentation of the story itself, not to say the Vatican is correct or not.

True. My point was solely that they didn't condemn the printing press, and they had different motivations for disliking some of what was distributed back then. As you said, they didn't want the priesthood to appear irrelevant when everyone could get access to and understand scripture on their own. It threatened…

You're right; they did in fact make mention back then of the dangers of spreading around occult knowledge that way. And, as you'd imagine, they didn't condemn the printing press. Just as they are not condemning the Internet here. They were and are merely stating a fact of how the technologies allow for easier…

@brobot: Though I agree, would you be so kind as to include a proper, correct assessment of the actual story to help others understand it better? Providing a grade won't really help anything. Providing an explanation of what the story is really about, now that would actually help and inform people.

I think there has been a fundamental misunderstanding here.

"Frankly, if something exceeds your ability to understand how it works, it sort of becomes magical. Thankfully, for most people, that's a pretty low bar."

Agreed.

Is it already April 1st somewhere? Because this sounds like a bunch of bologne. Who in their right mind would pay $30 for a movie rental?

@Jackstick: Wow. I've not been a fan of any jokes around this tragedy, but I have to applaud this effort. It isn't offensive; it's just awesome.

It would definitely suck. Though, oddly enough, maybe they'd find some friends and have a good laugh.

Sure, they -might- go, but there would not be photographic evidence to embarrass those people. And, for all intents and purposes, no one on 4chan could prove or attest to the fact that -anyone- actually went unless they themselves went to that location on May 13th. So, it would undermine the very essence of their…

What if someone in NYC were to take down that camera on May 12th? Then the joke would be on 4chan. :D

@JustinPM: Judging by how he dresses, Gaddafi certainly could be a wizard.

@PacJack360: Because they're loud and only good for causing disasters?