Traveling.

After reading this article I’m still trying to understand the thesis... are you
a) Just stating the situation, to explain to readers what’s going on and why? Or are you

“But what happens to Crown Vic now, and to its female employees?”

It also serves to raise the legitimate question of “Why is someone who is clearly a dangerous psychopath allowed to keep an arsenal of frighteningly-efficient murder-machines?”

What I’m curious about is: the rules agree with the runner (http://m.mlb.com/news/article/1…), however, doesn’t the fact that the umpire signaled the play dead have an impact here? One can argue that due to the fact that the umpire motioned in this way, then the Blue Jays did not make an effort to get the runner out.…