The Model Y is ugly. It literally looks like a model 3 that was vertically scaled by 1.5. Same with the X.
The Model Y is ugly. It literally looks like a model 3 that was vertically scaled by 1.5. Same with the X.
For a brand new generation of beta testers.
Strong agree.
Yep, I know 125% sounds impressive. But start with a small enough number and you can get absurd % increases while not really doing any volume. Just look at Fiat and the new 500e, that will have huge increases in 2024 and 2025, but the numbers will be tiny still and most likely be a profit loser, even with huge %…
It would be great if someone would properly look into Tony and his activities at Canoo. He’s been scamming investors to fund his lifestyle for years now. Whether its the family owned shell companies leasing his corporate jet back to Canoo for his own use, or the backroom deals to investment groups he owns a part of to…
The way they say they're being heavily invested in and that they're definitely not on the chopping block tells me they're definitely on the chopping block.
Untrue, actually.
You may not want to buy it though. May be better off going to buy something used at the end for a bargain, or if the leases are still as good as they are now, you may be happy to lease again.
They’ve got a new car being developed in our soon to be 51st state of Ottowa. You wouldn’t have seen it yet. Very secret.
Classic corporate non-statement. Chrysler has a bright future with Stellantis until they announce that they are nuking it. Every $billion corporation would rather nuke a subbrand like Chrysler for $billions in costs over selling it to defray costs. Why? I do not know, I just know that $billion corporations love to…
I bet that lower windshield helps with forward visibility in tight spaces, but maybe don’t drive this while wearing a kilt, okay?
Thanks, I love it.
Considering that Chrysler is just a minivan away from going full Jaguar, That’s one big dollop of bravado Feuell is laying on CNBC.
EREVs also make towing a reality for an EV. Trains do it pretty well already.
But range extension isn’t about being more efficient, it’s about removing/reducing range anxiety. Which, real or not, is a legitimate concern for many buyers.
While they offer flexibility in packaging a series hybrid will *NEVER* be as efficient as a parallel hybrid in steady-state operation. In reality packaging/size/weight isn’t any different.
I think the automotive industry really needs to stop calling these “Hybrids”. Hybrids were predominantly ICE vehicles with electric assistance. Hence still directly connected to the motor.
EREVs (Extended Range EVs) are exactly that. EV’s that have a generator on board to power the battery. This made sense as you…
Those are called EREVs and they’ve been gaining some traction in markets where the charging infrastructure is less than ideal.
I get that it’s probably too new to make CR’s listicle, but Civic seems an omission. That car checks almost all my boxes.