Apparently she was expecting the founder of the Playboy Empire to be an enlightened feminist who treats women as equals.

Sadly, all she has to show for her time there is a book deal, a TV show, and 15 minutes of fame.

Ha! I get my news from multiple sources, countries, and ideologies.

And that you haven’t even skimmed the book referenced in that comment

Actually, your argument is exactly as I laid it out.

So, your reasoning goes something like this:

I’m gonna guess you read an article on “how to win arguments” and it said something about copy/pasting and rebuttal, but you’re rebuttal is weak and nonsensical.

I’m not talking about being at the mansion - I’m talking about being in a relationship with Hefner (which Holly was).

Now, if you’re calling it a “business decision” to live at the Playboy Mansion, and if part of that “job” is to have sex with Hefner, then apparently Hefner and the girls should be arrested for prostitution offenses, because that sort of thing isn’t legal in Beverly Hills.

Oh it’s Roof’s, and the right wing media’s divisive, violent rhetoric are part of the reason this kid felt the need to do something about it.

Did you miss the part where he admitted his fault?

Why are you so interested in hiding his motivations?

Nobody said the world’s black and white, cupcake.

A woman’s presence in the Playboy mansion is essentially a business decision. She wasn’t in an “emotionally abusive relationship.”

I do hope you realize I was being facetious.

To any people out there who doubt that America is almost as racist now as it was during the times of slavery

If you don’t accept the premise that Rush Limbaugh and the gun industry are as guilty as Roof is, you’re “making excuses.”

I know, right?

it’s also believable that Hugh Hefner pitted the women that lived with him against each other and emotionally manipulated them to get what he wanted.

Charlie Hebdo doesn’t count.

You misspelled Obama.