farmerengineer4life
farmerengineer4life
farmerengineer4life

I'm a dude, so always going #2 at work means toilet paper lasts forever. I think I went through like 1 roll in 6 months. But I always hate going with other people in the bathroom. I always have to wait until I have a free path to the sink. Making eye contact in the bathroom after going #2 is the worst thing ever

shit-shaming?

18

Assualt is usually only assault if someone presses charges (or dies). 99.9% of the time in hockey, both combatents are willing participants. If both are willing combatents, know that they will accept the outcome, and obviously there is recorded evidence (and hundreds of witnesses); neither can legitimately press

Bitches be crazy

You don't think that individual states couldn't form their own subsidy programs? Wouldn't that benefit you? Then you wouldn't have to pay for their programs. The benefits of having stronger states is that they can tailor their own money to programs they want/need. Florida could tailor their money for hurricane

This is like the Music Man meets the NFL.

Wow...you are extremely mistaken on this one. Why don't you get educated on the topic before running your methophorical mouth. Some subsidies are needed (like crop insurance, protection against large drops in prices, conservation programs). However, most are wasteful.

I usually only go on I-81 or 83 during non-peak hours, but I usually average 75 mph (except in the heart of Harrisburg). And the turnpike, as long as you aren't the fastest on the road, you'll be fine. So I usually can go 75 because usually there are people going 80.

Technically it's because our roads aren't as flat or straight (or as nice). Even I-80 or the turnpike isn't as flat or straight.

I wouldn't say you are necessarily "subsidizing" their lifestyle. You may be pay slightly more for their roads. But considering they need little to no public services, they may be paying more than you. I think that Montana (and other similiar red states) would be able to declare independence because of how the tax

The ratio is almost entirely based on how sparsely populated the state is. Federal funding is primarily based on two variables, population and land area. Some costs (education, social security, welfare) are based on population, others (infrastructure, roads, land management) is based on the size of the state. If

I'm pretty sure that more people would sign a petition to get rid of Florida. Cue the Bugs Bunny gif

Maybe they generate more income. Texas does have one of the most robust state economies. The food insecurity is due to the high illegal immigrant population (and poor legal immigrant population). The economy probably takes advantage of the cheap labor which probably fuels the economy. (sorta like China)

The map is kind of deceiving. Money distributed to states is a primarily function of two variables, people and land area. So obviously the most densely populated states will use less money per person (NE, CA, etc), and the least populated states (MT,ND,SD,AK,etc) will use more money per person, because some of the

You notice at 12:15 why so many people have dash cams. People will jump onto your car, then the witnesses (aka. their accomplicies) will testifiy that it was your fault. People will also drive their damaged car into yours and they'll try to pull the same stunt in order to get you/your insurance to pay for the damage.

Cue the Sandusky jokes.

How about anything Taylor Swift? That would probably get old fast. Especially that annoying never, ever song.

Considering men are the primary purchasers of the magazine, a half naked women is more more likely to be picked up and and purchased in a store than a half naked man.

That was the one item that made me lose it. I just put my head down on my desk.