Exactly. I’m not gonna go out of my way to praise this kind of representation which doesn’t really represent anyone and can be read a myriad ways. 

As a gay guy, I find this constant sorta take on such things to be, by this point, tired, if not slightly offensive.  Sure, I’m fine with people giving it a queer reading (and afterall, two women DO make out), but going so far to say this is adding to the LGBTQ canon??  WTF.

“Edgy” straight Democrat-style liberals really don’t give a shit about gay identity anymore, do they? Sure, right, these gimmicky pod people suffice to embody gay and lesbian perspectives, or whatever, just any old thing will do, huh?

If Gestalt really is just one person, one consciousness, operating these bodies simultaneously, then the idea of naming them and addressing each one as an individual makes zero sense. I mean, if I met someone who told me that they’d named their hands and feet and expected me to address each one by name and gender, I’d…

I know I’m probably going to get a ton of flack for this, but I just rewatched the movie and i have to say, it was pretty bad.

boob armor is dumb

Looks like someone just saw Metropolis for the first time.

Is there a word in some other language that captures the feeling “I always hated this guy, and I feel both sad and smug knowing they are the trash heap I suspected they were”?

I’m so relieved that people have started to notice his shit because in the ‘90s I felt like I was the only one who disliked him for all his obvious problems. I guess the ‘90s was a decade where we forgot that womens and racial issues mattered and Tarantino types got passes but so glad that maybe time is up on these…

There are no fucking words after that, none. He’s finished, done. I’ve heard some attempted defences of people over the course of the post-Weinstein saga but never anything so extraordinarily disregarding of what actually happened as this with Tarantino wanting to be a pedant about the legal definition of rape all of…