@studbike: Totally agreed on the two press bullshit. My Audi, however, can be set to open all on one using a secret key combo.

@MaWeiTao: I am a long time Gibson fan and felt really let down by his 90's novels, but I liked the Sprawl trilogy. Zero History is probably the best of the three.

I've always loved big cars - I've owned two of the cars on this list!

Thumbs up, love articles like this!

More articles like this please. Thanks.

Mercedes w123 vs. Volvo 240DL

@speedzonevideo: '70 for more styling cues.

@speedzonevideo: I'd say the Celica owes a lot to the Torino, moreso than the Mustang, as it was 1969 when they were touring the Ford HQ.

I drive a '69 Ford Torino GT fastback, '79 Mercedes 240D and 2000 Audi TT. Where do I fit?

What a mess of bad writing, grammar and general bad attitude.

Glad to see the Torinos getting a higher and higher profile - most people had no idea they even existed a few years ago, which is when I bought mine and spent 3 years removing rust and replacing worn out parts. I'm more partial to the earlier '68-'69 body style but the '70-'71 is pretty sweet too.

For $2K I got a '79 Mercedes 240D for the little woman to drive around in. Only 200K on it, and after dropping another $2K in brakes and other assorted maintenance items, it should last another 30 years.

@pinkshinyalan: I dunno, my '79 240D is pretty simple. It's all vacuum operated!

@dolo54 blows minds and blows engines!: Hell, I pay $300/month for my parking space in downtown Toronto - I can't imagine Manhattan would be cheaper!

@OM617.951: The engine shared a lot of the tooling with the gasoline Oldsmobile 350, so they are technically correct.

@LuciferV8: I was just about to post about the W123 and saw yours.

@fatfrank72: In 1992? Yes, I saw tons of them. Hell, I had a few.

You can really tell the age of posters - not one person puts up the 70's classic traction bars?

Let's try this one more time.