The same reason they use cliffhangers everywhere—to get you to keep watching.

I can honestly say that I have no idea what fun there is to be derived from trolling a two year old tongue-in-cheek response o.O

Pre-albino??

So hoping.

A minor nitpick, but the moment Peter Parker becomes a hero is not when Uncle Ben dies.

I think it was just product placement, and Netflix stores their data on Seagate® drives.

Maybe they'll go with Kaare Andrews's 'inverted Game of Death'

Deliver me from LL Bean.

I am utterly baffled as to why you got the "why bother" and "I don't see what's to disagree" stuff.

Right, she was his stalker!

There are a lot of utterly baffling phrases in this review that look like Alston skimmed a thesaurus and thought "eh, close enough" in making some word choices.

Sure you're not thinking of Secret Wars or something?

He's really just named for his own last name.

Whoops. I was going to save my explanation for whoever explicitly asked rather than practically copypasta it at everyone but wanted to respond to everyone else as well. Sigh.

Admittedly, this is more of a broad response—not just to comics (happens less often in comics discussions, by far). But once I was turned off elsewhere (sometimes by the article writing itself, sometimes by the conversations) there wasn't much cause to wander in just a subset so far as I could see.

Generally true, but I hung around for a good few years here and something of it started to bug me—to be clear, at least some percentage has been the change in writers for the site itself

I don't think I was particularly noticeable in the first place, but something of the tenor here started turning me off a while ago. I pop in on occasion, but not often. As a Valiant advocate I dropped in on this one. I have my comic discussions elsewhere these days.

Not too long ago, some Sheriff or something referenced the Japanese interment camps. Fondly.

Already pre-ordered my hilarious collector's edition. All-in.

Ah, Lobo's Law: