But Kim can't do that. She has nothing to say.

Look at Batey's eyes...you can see he is trying really hard not to freak the fuck out. Also, his attorney probably counseled him to not show any emotion, regardless of the verdict.

"Have you tried sticking it up your arse? [hangs up] "Ohh...yeah, yeah. I just realized that was my mother."

Have you tried turning it off and on again. hehehe

"White, 56, is not shy about telling her story. With her first abortion, at 22, she says she felt staff at the clinic did not inform her of the risks; with the second, at 27, she says a doctor pressured her to go through with it even though she'd changed her mind, telling her it was too late to change course.…

There are people who think masturbation in a relationship constitutes cheating. Most of us refer to those people as "complete fucking lunatics."

What's more shocking is that they're given out as a "here, we don't know what's wrong with you so... Instead of giving you real information or pointing you in the right direction, take these and go do your own research ". While I understand the problem with opiods and their highly addictive levels, maybe the real…

... maybe women need them? I know I feel pain in a very different way to MrPants and OTC pain meds that fix him right up do nothing for me at all until I get something with codeine or stronger.

That is great. But you are allowed to "listen to God" or flip a coin or see a psychic to decide what laws to support. You can get pissed about it, but you sound like an idiot if you think such behavior or reasoning is "not allowed" or however you want to put it.

But that is basically what law does. It imposes standards of some portion of a group on the whole group. Yes, the law tramples your right not to be subject to the law.

So why do we use public money to help the poor and sick? For the most part, the motivation behind this is that it is morally wrong to allow people to live in abject poverty or sickness. It is a moral stance. Under your standards, such social programs should be "banned" - whatever the fuck that means. Feel free to…

This woman is the type of mother that makes me hate mothers.

I know - it goes back to how these guys think they are the Default Humans. White men are neutral, women and minorities are biased and special interest types. Them voting for their peers is a given because the candidates are standard, Default candidates. Us voting for our peers means we are deliberately going against…

Hmm. I have definitely had lovers pulls my tampon out like it was NBD. Shrug.

Your religion guiding your moral stance, whether it be on abortion, homelessness, education or anything else, is not trumping someone else's rights. This is the stupidest argument in this area that has now been repeated and parroted by so many non-thinking people that it has become accepted without explanation.

I've noticed more anti-choicers claiming they're not religious or claiming their opposition to abortion has nothing to do with religion. They claim it's about "human rights" (the human being the embryo or fetus) or it's about"fiscal responsibility." Crap arguments, obviously, but I can believe a lot of anti-choicers…

Unless you are suggesting something much more authoritarian than any interpretation of the Constitution would allow, it would still be an issue. Because banning abortion is no more "religious" than banning theft.

This is why we should have been more cautious about letting ladies become legislators.

I object to Nancy Grace because she's really, really bad at what she does. And she's a panic junkie.