I agree that off label prescriptions serve and important use and purpose. My problem is that the pharmaceutical company can withhold information on off-label uses as proprietary / commercial confidential information, limiting that information's disclosure in the New Drug Application(NDA). I'm of the opinion that all…

The character creator is extremely robust and customizeable, though it's difficult to really manage all the options (between face morphing and body morphing) without an understanding of japanese or a reference guide to what the options mean.

Yeah I agree. Mark felt kind of like a disposable character (coming out of nowhere from Ep1), so I kind of predicted once he went in the house we wouldn't be seeing him in the same state again. Which made me feel kind of sad.

I'm not "afraid" of anything. You're using a trope to criticize a game which has probably the most robust character creation system ever made, for having the option to create characters such as the one you're critcizing.

The entire drug approval and consideration system needs to be re-thought. It's almost absurd that drugs get approved only for specific uses, but still get prescribed off label estimated between 20-25% of the time (or perhaps it's that 20-25% of all prescriptions are off label, I forget.)

The best part about Kinja is that you get 9 comments that anyone will look at (though usually they only look at the first 3) and the first 9 are almost universally saying the same thing. Anything interesting posted that isn't within 5 minutes of the article going up gets lost under the double arrow.

Of course it will work out better than in tomb raider. Because the main character is a man. It's ok to put a man in bad situations, or make them seem vulnerable because there is no controversy with men.

It's out for the PS3 and it has been for some time.

I got the same thing on PS3.

I called the cannibalism as soon as I noticed they were being friendly too. But my girlfriend didn't see it coming.

Same thing happened to me!

The entire series is $5 cheaper on the PS3. (20 for the season instead of 25 over steam). That was what really influenced my decision.

Because making generalizations such as the one in the initial post in this thread, the one I've quoted TWICE is the furthest thing from egalatarianism. It's not taking issue with misogyny. It's taking issue with MEN. And as a man why would I not be upset.

My response was directly to the initial post in this reply thread, really, the one that said "It's probably to going to get worse because men love holding a grudge, and driving that fucker into the ground."

But I'm not making generalizations about a group of people, but about the ideology those people follow. Though I do appreciate the irony. Perhaps I should have said "feminists such as yourself." and responded to ThrillofVictory as I initially intended, and the more sweeping generalization is an artifact of moving my…

You equate me CONSTANTLY to someone who is racist, sexist, misogynistic and I've said virtually nothing to make you think I'm one. Is it always your personal prerogative to just label anyone who disagrees with you as a societal malcontent?

Did you like it in Chrono Trigger?

You're right, I did nor properly express myself. What I meant to say was "Regardless of actual merit, to summarily dismiss any point of view from an opposing perspective is troubling." Yes, some arguments should be summarily dismissed.

I don't want to get into the the whole MRA discussion, but I disagree that women are still socially and legally disadvantaged. They have many advantages at pretty much every level. Can you come up with a single institutional example where they are disadvantaged?