This answer is so right it is almost cheating.

Also $36k in Australia.

And too have actually been the first (this one probably isn't the first either but you get my point)

Invented the class? Hardly...

Also

Good. Good... I was on my way to post this, thought I better check the comments first

I wasn't stalking your comments, the new commenting system forces you to scroll by each comment one by one.

Don't you get it? We enthusiast need Camrys so we can identify boring people.

Oh, haven't you heard? Apparently Toyota collaborated with this other company...Subaru? I think it was Subaru and they released this...sports car? Yeah it was definitely a sports car, but there is absolutely no way you could have heard of the GT-86/FRS/BRZ...because it is so obscure.

1. Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 2:45.63 '08

Mandanangbangmang no body cares what you say.

herp derp your an idiot

Off topic.

Don't be mad bro, just don't tell people this is safe or normal because it isn't the first and shouldn't be the latter.

Did he die during a dyno run? No, he died of heart failure, how is that relevant. Oh, and it was because he died that they never ran MR PSI at a professional drag event. In testing it was running 9s (they were aiming for 8s) still with the IRS rear end.

That question make absolutely no sense. Are you suggesting that you are involved in "the actual power production of vehicles"? What is the power production of vehicles?

1st. Where is it clearly weighted down? He would have components in the tray that would need to be observed during the run, fuel cells/pumps etc.

Here are some custom car builders who built an insane Falcon with zero carbon footprint...what have you done lately?

Gasoline is not inefficient, internal-combustion engines are.

Hey, this guy knows his way around Jalop, so don't be rattling on about inefficiency dammit.