The way you constantly bring up lynching? The way you constant omit that rape was behind murder, robbery, and other crimes charged by white men? No, thanks, i'm not going to go look through all your crap. I just have to wait till the next time Jameis Wilson or Chris Brown get brought up.

Wow. If they put getting offended above understanding WHY women angry, what kind of ally are they? Sounds like you expect women to tiptoe around men for fear of offending them.

He's one of our local MRAs.

You protest too much.

And yet nobody wants to talk about the dudes who, when faced with a discussion about some horrible thing men do to women, decide that the REALLY important thing is that they talk about men, thereby demonstrating how little they care about women.

Huh what? He's always bitching on topics about rape, declaring women lie. If you dare argue with him———-it's pretty classic sexism———-he either calls YOU a liar too or disappears or insults you. But it's not sexist because he's him.

Welcome to "Fuck your tone trolling, asshole, and there's the door." You never were interested in feminism. You were looking for an excuse.

This is funny given the way he loves accusing women of lying about rape.

Problem is the you're talking to does like to accuse women en masse of lying about things like rape———-and then he tries to argue it's not sexism.

Flowbee likes to accuse women of lying en masse so he's a good example of that.

But is it similar to the way in which a man constantly interrupts rape and domestic violence discussions to declare that women lie about rape? Fun fact: when a guy brings up lynching to justify accusing women of frequently lying about rape, he's not going to mention that contemporary accounts place the charge of…

Coming from a rapist apologist who regularly accuses white women of lying en masse about rape this is rich indeed.

You seem really eager to find that excuse, dude. It's really obvious, too.

Oh, how will we cope?

Angry women you mean, don't you, neckbeard? Angry women who nailed your pimply scraggly ass so accurately after all your sexism that you're taking your cliches and limping off back to Deadspin.

"....or who."

Oh, diddums, no. Your IQ must be this high before you can participate and your utter inability to grasp sarcasm——-"Nobody said that!"——-and your condescension and use of the standard "Now, now, settle down, little lady," trope all combine to get you hustled back to the kiddie table where you belong.

Why assume when all your opinions show off your neckbeardieness perfectly? You've whipped out ALL the de rigueur neckbeard cliches about Jezebel readers, which I've no doubt you use on any woman who doesn't bow down. The only thing you haven't whipped out in your comprehensive list of sexist bullshit is the "on the…

You totally ignored the substance of her comment, but I DO like the way you showed how you only care about "dark alley" sexism when you specified "force" being a necessary component before you care. That these girls accept this practice indicates there are no other choices offered, but let's ignore that because you…

...and those very same people couldn't give less of a shit about, you know, women in Afghanistan or wherever when people discuss that topic by itself. Kind of like the "false accusation" obsessives never give a fuck about false accusations of, say, burglary.....or when the false accusation is against a woman.