You should know that nothing good comes after "I'm not......but?" You ask two hypothetical questions in your very next line, designed to minimize and/or explain away what this asshole did. Also? Screw that concept of "accidental harassment." Read the fucking letter again.

This is exactly how abusers work. Lies and liars are often pretty; the truth is not.

Booze doesn't make you do shit you wouldn't do while sober, it just lowers your inhibitions so that you think: "go for it!" I bet you're not the only person he tried that with.

It's funny how you dodge it every time while continuing to defend predators.

Fuck yeah it is my place. The fact that this guy might compartmentalize his victims does not make his actions toward her ignorable. "....there might still be good aspects of his character"? Like, he does a great macarena so who gives a shit that he harasses and abuses women? Wow. That's exactly the kind of…

Determined to miss the point, aren't you? They ALREADY HAVE decided. Their opinion is shitty and that's that. And asking her friends to "unfriend" him isn't "childish"———as you say elsewhere. He's a predator who hurt her and her friends are shitbags because that SHOULD bother them. Your whole defense of these guys…

Those aren't comical. They're obviously out of control. I haven't seen any mention of Lovato's history at all. Wilson's treatment———his issues weren't parodied in the press———are exactly the treatment I'm talking about. Sheen isn't a great example———he's a self-parody at this point.

Um, man who's trying to justify letting another off the hook for sexual harassment? He sexually harassed her. I like how you——-another dude———-ignore the important things to focus on irrelevant shut.

Boy, lots of assholes are arguing that it's okay to ditch a victim in favor of the dude who harassed her———mostly because they're just such craven shits they don't want to make a choice and a decision. Well, welcome to fucking adulthood, because you have to do the right thing and often it's hard.

I don't understand this "not getting in the middle." Where's this non-existent middle? One person hurt the other person. There's no middle there.

That's because it IS an insult.

I'm sorry, we just had a discussion about this. The person who was wronged deserves priority. The bad guy, well, sucks to be him.

Why should they doubt her but not him? They're shitty friends if they basically view her as a liar while trusting him. And they're sending more than one message, too.

1. Men are fertile every day of the month. They need to be more responsible, as they are far more reproductively dangerous to women than vice versa.

They're condoning it by not cutting him off.

How could anybody associate with some body who was so horrible to a friend and NOT be bothered by it? It should matter. They're condoning what he did to her.

Er.....he did something really shitty to her and that SHOULD fucking matter? They're saying that they don't give a shit what he did to her. And that is why guys like that keep doing it, because douchebags like her friends let them get away with it.

When they say "Get over it," they mean, "Shut up so I don't have to feel guilty."

Spenguin is one of our MRA-lite dudes.

They're not your friends if they condone the harassment or abuse this guy did to you.